BOOKS BY A. E. ABEDI
  • Home

Plato's Atlantis Found! It's Buried On The Floor Of The Atlantic

11/20/2012

1 Comment

 
"Very deep." Wrote Thomas Mann at the opening of his mythologically conceived tetralogy, Joseph and His Brothers. "is the well of the past. Should we not call it bottomless?" And he then observed: "The deeper we sound, the further down into the lower world of the past we probe and press, the more do we find that the earliest foundations of humanity, its history and culture, reveal themselves unfathomable." Primitive Mythology by Joseph Campbell page 5 

In artist's imaginations... and movies as well, there seems to be this idea that the ruins of a civilization that are 12,000 years old (or even 6 thousand years, if you want to be conservative to start), will just be laying there at the bottom of the ocean and all you gotta go is snorkel past one to find it. Yet, there has never been ANY ruin found, of ANY age, that hasn't been covered in a ton of dirt. So why wouldn't buildings at the bottom of the ocean be covered in dirt? On the side of a mountain that is submerged, yes. you can find uncovered ancient ruins (like with Japan below). But that whole area is pure rock. The Atlantic is pure mud.
Picture
"Naturally, every age thinks that all ages before it were prejudiced, and today we think this more than ever and are just as wrong as all previous ages that thought so. How often have we not seen the truth condemned! It is sad but unfortunately true that man learns nothing from history." - Carl Jung

In this case, the above quote means simply, 'we like to believe what we have always believed and don't like change'.

The Sphinx before being excavated...
Picture
Picture
(Image Source)

The Stone Statues in Easter Island have bodies !
This is absolutely incredible. Here we've been thinking for all these years that they were just heads. They are going to be absolutely huge when they are completely excavated. It all just adds to the mystery of these amazing sculptures. Maybe now they can get more information about them seeing as they have writings on them.

UNEARTHED: Massive carved stones about 11,000 years old... pre-dating Stonehenge by some 6,000 years!

The following is from the website Smithsonian.com:

"Six miles from Urfa, an ancient city in southeastern Turkey, Klaus Schmidt has made one of the most startling archaeological discoveries of our time: massive carved stones about 11,000 years old, crafted and arranged by prehistoric people who had not yet developed metal tools or even pottery. The megaliths predate Stonehenge by some 6,000 years. The place is called Gobekli Tepe

The tallest pillars tower 16 feet and, Schmidt says, weigh between seven and ten tons. As we walk among them, I see that some are blank, while others are elaborately carved: foxes, lions, scorpions and vultures abound, twisting and crawling on the pillars' broad sides."



Here are some images from the archeological site:
Picture
Picture
Picture

There are STILL at least 17 pyramids buried under the sands of Egypt...

Egyptian pyramids found by infra-red satellite images (from the BBC)...

Seventeen lost pyramids are among the buildings identified in a new satellite survey of Egypt.

More than 1,000 tombs and 3,000 ancient settlements were also revealed by looking at infra-red images which show up underground buildings.

Initial excavations have already confirmed some of the findings, including two suspected pyramids.

The work has been pioneered at the University of Alabama at Birmingham by US Egyptologist Dr Sarah Parcak.

Picture

Atlantis

CRITIAS by Plato 360 BC translated by Benjamin Jowett New York, C. Scribner's Sons, [1871]:

Let me begin by observing first of all, that nine thousand was the sum of years which had elapsed since the war which was said to have taken place between those who dwelt outside the Pillars of Heracles and all who dwelt within them; this war I am going to describe. Of the combatants on the one side, the city of Athens was reported to have been the leader and to have fought out the war; the combatants on the other side were commanded by the kings of Atlantis, which, as was saying, was an island greater in extent than Libya and Asia, and when afterwards sunk by an earthquake, became an impassable barrier of mud to voyagers sailing from hence to any part of the ocean. The progress of the history will unfold the various nations of barbarians and families of Hellenes which then existed, as they successively appear on the scene; but I must describe first of all Athenians of that day, and their enemies who fought with them, and then the respective powers and governments of the two kingdoms. Let us give the precedence to Athens.(Some or most of the Dialogue of Critias has been lost)
Picture
Map of Atlantis based on Plato's descriptions, published in the New York American
on October 20, 1912 from Imagining Atlantis © 1998 by Richard Ellis.

Picture
 This extract from the work of Plato (circa 427 - 347 BC) is the first appearance in classical literature of the Atlantis myth. It is supposed to be part of a story told by Plato's great grandfather (Critias), who heard it from his great-grandfather (Dropides), who heard it from an Athenian traveller (Solon). The narrator is an Egyptian priest talking to Solon. It is supposed to describe a historical war between the ancient Athenians and the legendary Atlantis.

[EXTRACT] 'Our records show how your city checked a great power which arrogantly advanced from its base in the Atlantic Ocean to attack the cities of Europe and Asia. For in those days the Atlantic was navigable. There was an island opposite the strait which you call the Pillars of Hercules (Straits of Gibraltar), an island larger than Libya (Africa) and Asia combined; from it travellers could in those days reach the other islands, and from them the whole opposite continent which surrounds what can truly be called the ocean. For the sea within the strait we were talking about is like a lake with a narrow entrance (the Mediterranean sea); the outer ocean is the real ocean and the land which entirely surrounds it is properly termed continent. On this island of Atlantis had arisen a powerful and remarkable dynasty of kings, who ruled the whole island, and many other islands as well and parts of the continent; in addition it controlled, within the strait, Libya up to the borders of Egypt and Europe as far as Tyrrhenia (Italy). This dynasty, gathering its whole power together, attempted to enslave, at a single stroke, your country and ours and all the territory within the strait. It was then, Solon, that the power and courage and strength of your city became clear for all men to see. Her bravery and military skill were outstanding; she led an alliance of the Greeks, and then when they deserted her and she was forced to fight alone, after running into direst peril, she overcame the invaders and celebrated a victory; she rescued those not yet enslaved from the slavery threatening them, and she generously freed all others living within the Pillars of Hercules. At a later time there were earthquakes and floods of extraordinary violence, and in a single dreadful day and night all your fighting men were swallowed up by the earth, and the island of Atlantis was similarly swallowed up by the sea and vanished; this is why the sea in that area is to this day impassable to navigation, which is hindered by mud just below the surface, the remains of the sunken island'

Translation by Sir Desmond Lee, first published 1965, Penguin Classics.

Although Plato describes Atlantis as an island in the Atlantic Ocean, and some Canarian writers have associated Atlantis with the Canaries, it is now generally believed that the Atlantis myth is a memory of Minoan Crete, a civilisation which was overwhelmed by the volcanic explosion of the Mediterranean island of Santorini in the fifteenth century BC.   

Picture
Atlantis (in Greek, Ἀτλαντὶς νῆσος, "island of Atlas") is a legendary island first mentioned in Plato's dialogues Timaeus and Critias, written about 360 BC. According to Plato, Atlantis was a naval power lying "in front of the Pillars of Hercules" that conquered many parts of Western Europe and Africa 9,000 years before the time of Solon, or approximately 9600 BC. After a failed attempt to invade Athens, Atlantis sank into the ocean "in a single day and night of misfortune".

Scholars dispute whether and how much Plato's story or account was inspired by older traditions. In Critias, Plato claims that his accounts of ancient Athens and Atlantis stem from a visit to Egypt by the legendary Athenian lawgiver Solon in the 6th century BC. In Egypt, Solon met a priest of Sais, who translated the history of ancient Athens and Atlantis, recorded on papyri in Egyptian hieroglyphs, into Greek. Some scholars argue Plato drew upon memories of past events such as the Thera eruption or the Trojan War, while others insist that he took inspiration from contemporary events like the destruction of Helike in 373 BC[1] or the failed Athenian invasion of Sicily in 415–413 BC.

The possible existence of a genuine Atlantis was discussed throughout classical antiquity, but it was usually rejected and occasionally parodied by later authors. Alan Cameron states: "It is only in modern times that people have taken the Atlantis story seriously; no one did so in antiquity".[2] The Timaeus remained known in a Latin rendition by Calcidius through the Middle Ages, and the allegorical aspect of Atlantis was taken up by Humanists in utopian works of several Renaissance writers, such as Francis Bacon's New Atlantis and Thomas More's Utopia. Atlantis inspires today's literature, from science fiction to comic books to films. Its name has become a byword for any and all supposed advanced prehistoric lost civilizations.

Every time someone finds ruins underwater they immediately think they have found Atlantis. It is more likely that there are such ruins underwater all over the planet - especially the ancient coastline...there is still a lot of investigation that needs to be done. What we don't need to do is wonder if there are any more underwater structures. They keep turning up year after year, some in plain sight, so there are definitely more. A thorough exploration across the globe is called for (we have only explored 3-5 percent of the ocean floor, which means there is a lot of territory left to cover - which we can narrow down using data of sea levels to find where the ancient coastline used to be. That's where we should start looking for more underwater ruins). 

The following is an example of someone promoting thier pet theory of where Atlantis is despite all evidence (or because of it? With such bad exposure and weird explanations that don't fit the facts, for anyone who is even a little Google competent, gives rise to paranoia, conspiracy theories and ultimately anarchy because of lack of trust. Only truth can solve that problem.). The interesting thing is that the key to understanding why they found this area of circular ruins underground is in the article (in bold). The funny part is that they only thought of Tsunami as a possibility after the Tsunamis that struck recently. Rising sea levels over thousands of years, till recently, has been the preferred theory as well as some Island that was covered in a volcanic eruption some 3000 years ago. I sometimes feel like if there isn't a cover up then we are dealing with some of the dumbest people known to man... who should not be allowed to teach in any respectable university. 
 Lost city of Atlantis believed found off Spain Archaeologists and geologists use imagery to find site ravaged by tsunami

NORTHAMPTON, Mass. — A U.S.-led research team may have finally located the lost city of Atlantis, the legendary metropolis believed swamped by a tsunami thousands of years ago, in mud flats in southern Spain.

"This is the power of tsunamis," head researcher Richard Freund told Reuters.

"It is just so hard to understand that it can wipe out 60 miles inland, and that's pretty much what we're talking about," said Freund, a professor at the University of Hartford who led an international team searching for the true site of Atlantis.
To solve the age-old mystery, the team analyzed satellite imagery of a suspected submerged city just north of Cadiz, Spain. There, buried in the vast marshlands of the Dona Ana Park, they believe that they pinpointed the ancient, multiringed dominion known as Atlantis.

The team of archaeologists and geologists in 2009 and 2010 used a combination of deep-ground radar, digital mapping and underwater technology to survey the site.

Freund's discovery in central Spain of a strange series of "memorial cities," built in Atlantis' image by its refugees after the city's likely destruction by a tsunami, gave researchers added proof and confidence, he said.

Atlantean residents who did not die in the tsunami fled inland and built new cities there, he added.


Picture
A computer graphic shows the concentric rings that may have existed during Atlantis' ancient heyday. Scientists have seen evidence of such submerged structures beneath the vast marshlands of southern Spain's Dona Ana Park.  

Standard approach to interpreting Plato's description of Atlantis is that the Egyptian Papyrus writings couldn't hold writing (magically I assume - or they thought Egyptians were just messing with Plato's head) ... and ancient people were so fickle out that an overflowing river would give rise to beliefs of a world wide deluge.

Picture
[From "The Encyclopedia of Science" on The legend of Atlantis] any fantastic stories from the past must have built up around natural phenomena that were beyond the power of people at the time to explain in rational terms. Dramatic reports from individuals who narrowly escaped a violent catastrophe of nature or who witnessed its effects from afar would have been eagerly seized upon by others and quickly exaggerated beyond all recognition. It seems at least possible that one the most fabulous legends of the western world may have come about in this way.

So much has been written and surmised about the "lost continent" of Atlantis in recent decades that it's easy to forget that the whole tale rests upon just one source of highly uncertain provenance: a description by Plato in his Timaeus and Critias. Plato claims, in these writings, that the story came to him by way of various intermediaries from his ancestor Solon who learned it, in turn, from Egyptian priests in 590 BC.

Some 9,000 years earlier, according to the legend, there was an island metropolis, roughly 32,000 square miles in area, lying beyond the Pillars of Hercules (the modern-day Straits of Gibraltar). It was dominated by hills and surrounded by two concentric rings of land, linked by bridges and roads. The water separating the rings formed extensive harbors connected by canals 150 feet deep and 500 yards wide. The vegetation was luxuriant, the land fertile and self-sufficient, and there were both hot and cold freshwater springs. Black, white, and red stones were quarried from beneath the central hill, leaving a natural roof for the inner harbor. The Atlanteans lived securely and comfortably in their island paradise – until, suddenly, disaster struck. According to Plato: "Through violent earthquakes and floods, in a single day and night of misfortune ... [the whole race] ... was swallowed up by the Earth and the island of Atlantis ... disappeared into the depths of the sea."

If a researcher doesn't believe what Plato has written in the Critias AND has done no other research (or is just an idiot)... he will assume that outside of the Straights of Gibraltar means inside and 9000 years ago means 1000 years ago...

Picture
Most of the historically proposed locations are in or near the Mediterranean Sea: islands such as Sardinia, Crete and Santorini, Sicily, Cyprus, and Malta; land-based cities or states such as Troy, Tartessos, and Tantalus (in the province of Manisa), Turkey; and Israel-Sinai or Canaan. The Thera eruption, dated to the 17th or 16th century BC, caused a large tsunami that experts hypothesize devastated the Minoan civilization on the nearby island of Crete, further leading some to believe that this may have been the catastrophe that inspired the story. A. G. Galanopoulos argued that the time scale has been distorted by an error in translation, probably from Egyptian into Greek, which produced “thousands” instead of “hundreds”; this same error would rescale Plato’s Kingdom of Atlantis to the size of Crete, while leaving the city the size of the crater on Thera; 900 years before Solon would be the 15th century BC. In the area of the Black Sea the following locations have been proposed: Bosporus and Ancomah (a legendary place near Trabzon). The Sea of Azov was proposed in 2003. The map above illustrates potential locations in the Mediterranean region.

Often EVERY Ancient Underwater Ruin Is ASSUMED to Be Atlantis By Their Discoverer! 

Picture
The location of Atlantis in the Atlantic Ocean has certain appeal given the closely related names. Popular culture often places Atlantis there, perpetuating the original Platonic setting. Several hypotheses place the sunken island in northern Europe, including Sweden (by Olof Rudbeck in Atland, 1672–1702), or in the North Sea. Some have proposed the Celtic Shelf and Andalusia as possible locations, and that there is a link to Ireland. The Canary Islands have also been identified as a possible location, west of the Straits of Gibraltar but in proximity to the Mediterranean Sea. Various islands or island groups in the Atlantic were also identified as possible locations, notably the Azores. However detailed geological studies of the Canary Islands, the Azores, and the ocean bottom surrounding them found a complete lack of any evidence for the catastrophic subsidence of these islands at any time during their existence and a complete lack of any evidence that the ocean bottom surrounding them was ever dry land at any time in the past. The submerged island of Spartel near the Strait of Gibraltar has also been suggested.
Elsewhere

Caribbean locations such as Cuba, the Bahamas, and the Bermuda Triangle have been proposed as sites of Atlantis. Areas in the Pacific and Indian Oceans have also been proposed including Indonesia, Malaysia or both (i.e. Sundaland) and stories of a lost continent off India named “Kumari Kandam” have inspired some to draw parallels to Atlantis, as has the Yonaguni formation of Japan. Antarctica has also been suggested.

The simple reality is that there are underwater ruins EVERYWHERE...

Underwater Ruins Off The Coast Of India

Picture
Next is a group of cities made of brick which seem to have materialized from nowhere;

"The so-called Harappa stage of the great cities of Mohenjo-daro, Chanhu-daro, and Harappa (c. 2500-1200/1000 B.C), which bursts abruptly into view, without preparation, already fully formed and showing many completely obvious signs of inspiration from the earlier high centers of the West (i.e. fertile crescent), yet undeniable signs, also, of a native Indian tradition – this too already well developed. As professor W. Norman Brown has suggested, a native Indian center (i.e., a mythogenetic zone) somewhere either in the south or in the Ganges-Jumna area would seem to be indicated, where the characteristically Indian traits, unknown at this time farther west, must have come into form. [JC1 - Page 435]

Other interesting facts about the cities of Mohenjodaro and Harappa is that the bricks used in making them are uniform, i.e. they had a system to measure and weigh stuff accurately. They had their own sewage system, public baths and the structure of the architecture suggest an egalitarian society, but there are no signs of architectural development. That means these cities arrived fully developed and then went into decline. There are no in-between cities or towns where the Mohenjodaro/Happan style of architecture is first used. 

With the discovery of ancient cities off the coast of India, the sudden appearance of Mohenjodara and Harrapa makes more sense. Cities that existed before a rise in the oceans(that began at the end of the last ice age) would explain the sudden appearance of cities like Mohenjodaro and Harrapa;

"The carbon dating of 7500 BC obtained for the wooden piece recovered from the site changes the earlier held view that the first cities appeared in the Sumer Valley [in Mesopotamia] around 3000 BC," said B Sasisekaran of India's National Science Academy.The images gathered over the past six months led to a surprising discovery - a series of well-defined geometric formations were clearly seen, spread irregularly across a nine-kilometre (five-mile) stretch, a little beneath the sea bed.

Some of them closely resemble an acropolis - or great bath - known to be characteristic of the Harappan civilisation.

The Gulf of Cambay is one of the largest tidal areas in the world - with a current of very high velocity - and so it is conceivable that the area may well have submerged an entire ancient settlement, Mr Ravindran said to the BBC.


There is undeniable evidence - i.e. you can see it for yourself - that there was a civilization or at least a bunch of advanced cities along the coastline before the end of the last ice age (about 12,000 years ago). 

Underwater Ruins of Yonaguni Jima Off The Coast Of Japan

The strangest(and most convincing) of all underwater finds concerns the monuments of Yonaguni Jima discovered off the coast of Japan...which were hotly debated at one time but more and more evidence has been accumulating suggesting that the structures are actually man made(cut right into the bedrock like many other structures found).

Most alternative archeological researchers seem to believe that there was a technologically advanced civilization who built their structures in stone that existed at the end of the last ice age, when the sea levels were over a hundred feet lower than today. Since the biggest cities are always built on the coast, the place to look for ancient cities would be the levels at which the ocean used to be at before all the ice melted(approx 9500 BC).

However, even without taking such extreme dating ideas seriously we can see that there are definitely underwater ruins strewn all over the planet. Since the ocean levels are thought to have gone up and done with mini ice ages, it may be that we had civilization earlier than we thought just not as early as some like to believe.

Take a look at the following pictures of possible staircases and other structures that must be man made...
Picture
There is no way nature made that. that is definitely man-made.
Picture
This structure consists of huge blocks of stone with a 'wedge' forming an arch. A common architecture design in ancient structures of Egypt and South America.
Picture
Triangular shaped structure - top view. Notice the gap between the stones. It looks like two stones chiseled and placed together. That isn't a natural formation either.

A Japanese Study Has Confirmed That The Age Of These Ruins Is Approximately 10,000 Years!

Here is an abstract of a Japanese Study; Title;Research for submarine ruins off Yonaguni, Japan. Journal Title;Bulletin of the College of Science, University of the Ryukyus

Abstract;Submarine research surveys using SCUBA and sonic surveys reveal detailed topography similar to submarine, pyramidal features looking like a stepped pyramid off Yonaguni in Okinawa, Japan. The site is called Iseki Point(ruins site) as a leisure diving spot. Yonaguni Submarine Pyramid(YSP) is the major structure that stands under approximately 25 meters of ocean. Essentially, it has a cliff face like the side of a stepped pyramid, and dimensions of about 290m(length) by 120m(width) by 26m(height). Flat terraces, straight walls and its surface structure of walls with scars of tool marks driven in by a wedge on the structure are identified to be artificially fabricated. Appearance and size of YSP are similar to the biggest, ancient castles such as Shuri and Nakagusuku Castles in Okinawa Island, where they are called 'gusuku'. Roads associated with drainage canals were recognized, surrounding YSP, and that a retaining wall was found along a road. The southern point of the wall is composed of huge rock fragments. Stone tools and other artifacts were discovered from the sea bottom. Those evidence strongly shows that the YSP has not been manufactured by nature. It is identifie to be man-made. The formation age is estimated to be about 10,000 years ago based on 14C and 10Be age determinations. (author abst.)

In all likelihood, Atlantis was just one island/culture amongst MANY. Just like the United States is one country amongst many. Every country is at different technological level all the way down to people living in grass skirts roaming in the deserts of Africa who think glass is an advanced creation. 

While the Indian civilization was slowly inundated, at least in part... Atlantis was said to have been swallowed by earthquakes and the ocean in one night. Could such a thing happen today? Yellowstone park is actually a super-volcano... and California is constantly quaking. So the answer is yes. Anything is possible, especially when we live on a super volcano and are helping to create earthquakes which can lead to Tsunamis. Think about it. New York City, Staten Island and New Jersey were torn apart by a category 1 storm. What if there was a real storm? Category 3 or 4? The fall of civilization or a city can be quick and abrupt.

Picture
In the old map above, north is pointing downwards. This means that according to this map, Atlantis was a large Island or continent that was in between Europe and North America. Which makes the mountain chain of "the Azores" a possible remnant of that land. After thier land was destroyed, about 10,000 BC, the survivors spread out in all directions, or so it seems.

Deep underwater, in the Atlantic, structures have been found. The structures are way too deep to have been built even during the ice age. It seems that, that area may have sunk!  i.e. " there were earthquakes and floods of extraordinary violence, and in a single dreadful day and night all your fighting men were swallowed up by the sea and vanished" Plato in The Critias

Picture
In May 2001, engineer Paulina Zelitzky, President, Advanced Digital Communications (ADC),
Victoria, B. C., Canada and Havana, Cuba, announced the discovery of megalithic
structures 2,200 feet down at the western tip of Cuba.

Picture
Picture
Aboveimages seem to be og one of the cities of Atlantis (atleast, to me).

The Bimini Road/Wall Or The Road To Atlantis? [Another confirmed ruin leading into the Atlantic ocean though it may be more recent.]  

Picture
[From Dive Spots] The Atlantis Road, or Bimini Road is one of the most popular tourist attractions in Bimini because of the mystery surrounding the site. In the 1930s, an American psychic named Edgar Cayce reported that he had spoken with a person who had lived in the Lost City of Atlantis in a former life. This Atlantean told Cayce that Atlantis had been near Bimini. Cayce predicted that portions of the temples of Atlantis would become visible near Bimini in '68 or '69. When a private pilot flying over the waters near North Bimini reported seeing a strange parallel structure in shallow water, many people believed these were either walls from Atlantis or a mysterious road leading to Atlantis. And thus the mystery of the Atlantis Road was born.

Since the 1970s, the structure has been explored by thousands of visitors, filmed for several TV specials, written about in books and magazines and drilled into by geologists. Eugene A. Shinn led a team of geologists who core-drilled the rocks and determined that the stones are submerged, natural beachrock that is the same as the beachrock found on nearby North Bimini. In spite of his findings, there are still many who believe that the two rows of parallel stones were placed in the "road" formation by intelligent beings.

The rectangular stones lie in 15 feet of water just a mile offshore of North Bimini. The stones are straight and certainly look as if they were placed in a wall or road. The site is a regular stop on all the dive charters. It is easily explored by snorkelers and divers. Whether you believe the stones are linked to the Lost City of Atlantis or merely just an interesting natural rock formation, the Atlantis Road is a fun divespot. 
The Bimini road is a series of limestone rocks that go out into the sea. The standard belief is that they are natural formations but some people say that they are part of a man made harbour.

A through investigation that refutes the above refutation (yes, I know it sounds funny) has been done by Greg Little called "Underwater Stone Formation At Bimini: Ancient Harbor Evidence" (since I got the pdf by email I uploaded it to my own Google account for easy access).

Best part of the Bimini structure is that it is easily explored by American divers and someone with time and money on their hands could do a deep sea survey of the general area and might find more structures buried underneath (deep sea sonar and satellite scanning is a way to get started). Although the PDF suggests a date around 9500BC, the type of stone structures found have been found in the Mediterranean as well. Thus this could be an ancient pier made when the ocean was lower during a mini ice age and not necessarily the big ice age 12000 years ago. The dominant theory is that it was a mid-way harbour to get to the underwater ruins of Cuba. Probably from a city that existed around the same time the height of the Mesopotamian Civilization (before the seas rose again). 

Given the ludicrous amount of evidence we have on ancient civilizations and underwater ruins, why arn't the history books being updated? Well, the archaeologists have been through years of training. They now believe their theories, which were ALL learnt from a textbook NOT experience, as if it's scripture. 

Historically, knowledge has always been approached from a holistic perspective. The Ancient Greeks studied every field of knowledge and put together theories after careful thought on all the evidence and theories they had on the world around them (this applies to Democritus, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle amongst others). In fact, it has been shown that the word they used which is often translated as 'virtue' (i.e. the word Arete) actually has meanings along the lines of 'Excellence' with the idea that a person should seek excellence in all aspects of life(shown in the Ancient Greeks approach to knowledge and ideas on living life)

Yet, in todays 'modern' academic world, from which all our theories on the structure of the worlds cultures and economy come from, is heavily fragmented into specialized fields of knowledge. This leads to problems in comming to agreement about simple facts and theories making progress on the more intricate theories and studies almost impossible (except by a tiny group of degree holders which tend to be called 'alternative' and relegated to the edges of mainstream science and media).

During the renaissance the scholars studied every field of knowledge. In fact, major break-throughs in science tended to come from individuals not directly linked to science for most of the history of science. It was only when the math became so complicated that specialized mathematical skills were required that 'lay men's' theories about the specific implication of mathematical formula became useless. For contradicting religious doctrine many Renaissance age scholars learned the hard way to avoid to contradict the church and over time an agreement was reach between the church and the new form of specialized knowledge that came to be known as 'scientists'. The agreement was simple, scientists will focus on observable phenomenon and avoid studying matters of faith and religious belief. So the modern enlightenment, or reemergence of ancient knowledge, began crippled. It's why I think A. N. Whitehead, (Process and Reality, 1929), is right when he says that all of modern western philosophical thought is a footnote to the works of Plato."The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato". It had to be. Plato could consider fields of knowledge that became socially and culturally unacceptable from about the 1700's to today's extremely fragmented state of academia, creating a type of scholar which gives scholarship a bad name.

A better type of scholar for understanding the complexity of science and the connection between the various fields of knowledge is Leonardo Da Vinci. A genuine liberal arts education with accurate textbooks could help generate more such scholars in the long-term (needs to be combined with better media influence as well).

The video below is of an interview of a modern 'ethical' philosopher. It is obvious that he believes that only he can ask and ponder the questions he has even when Stephen Colbert (a non-philosophy or economics degree holder) makes a brilliant case for the inaccuracy in one of his theories. (Note: This overspecialization of knowledge, particularly the division of  'ethicality' from other aspects of knowledge is something that Robert Pirsirg ranted about in his book "Zen and The Art of Motor Cycle Maintenance" attributing this problem to Plato and Aristotle, which could very well be correct).

The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive


Note that Michael's question about why baseball players get paid more than teachers is something you could explain to a 10 year old. It is easier to teach little kids than it is to throw 100 mile per hour fast balls or hit these fast balls out of the playing field. If all teachers could compete with modern baseball athletes on their level ONLY then could such a question be valid. The simple reality is that the skill that is rare gets paid more for. This is simple demand and supply economics (as Colbert points out) - Also note that I have a degree (bachelors) in economics which gives my simple explanation more weight but I prefer to use links to authoritative information as I think every writer in any field of knowledge should. Also note that he simply ignores Colbert's accurate counter response hiding behind the degree by saying roughly. ' this is a question for ethical philosophy' implying Colbert can't understand this particular field of philosophy (after all, the argument is, 'I have a degree in this, you don't'). Its not Michael's fault he doesn't know economics. It's not a requirement for knowledge (specialization begins right at the beginning at college level education and school textbooks are grossly out of date), he is illustrating a symptom of a much larger cultural problem (fragmentation of knowledge) which must be addressed and is the main point of all my blogs (the idea being to combine news media and education to create larger perspectives on modern challenges).

One of the most fragmented fields of knowledge is the one of archeology. The skills of excavation (or more accurately, patience?) have reached a new high but putting together the finds in a proper theoretical framework based on all available evidence, that has been confirmed as reliable, has broken apart to such a degree that cults seem to have formed around different theories. This seems to have made the support of various archeological theories (and evidence associated with it) a political and religious issue.

Introduction  to the modern archeology problem

The type of problems in archaeology revolve around one group disbelieving in historical writings if they are from a book of scripture vs. literal interpreters of the Bible vs. the archaeological evidence that is actually found. The following extract of a report on a recent discovery in Israel exemplifies this problem in analysis of archaeological evidence.
In a region where history, belief and ideology play such an important role, the discovery is controversial. Other archaeologists dispute the significance of the find.

Professor Israel Finkelstein, of Tel Aviv University, pointed out that the remains are not evidence of a powerful biblical state.

He said: "We are not talking about some great empire ruled from a wonderful capital, the way we look at Assyria in the 9th century B.C., or even the northern Kingdom of Israel in the 9th century B.C. We are here in a formative phase of the rise of Judah."

Finkelstein added: "Khirbet Qeiyafa does not make Judah a great empire with great armies."

Garfinkel argued that even if it was not the great empire of the bible, its existence is significant.

"What people try to do is say that the Kingdom of Judah didn't exist," he said. "What I am saying is that it existed. It's a small one, not so glorified as the Bible presented. But it doesn't mean there was nothing."

Here are a few extracts from websites of mainstream archeological theories about the age of civilization (not in line with Darwin's theory of evolution... please note that my visual explanation below of the variations of skull shapes and sizes nullifies much of the evidence cited by Darwinians. This does not mean that the theory is wrong, just that, like any scientific theory, it is a theory 'in the works' and does explain many natural phenomenon but not all archeological and observational evidence).

Website example 1: CIVILIZATION BEGINS: THE COPPER-STONE AGE, 3600-2800 B.C.

Website example 2: By 6500 B.C.E., humans secured for themselves a dependable food supply by planting crops and domesticating animals. As a result, the human population increased, food surpluses allowed for economic specialization and exchange, and the emergence of civilization was made possible.[The problem with the second theory statement is the large structures that have been found with no obvious settlement, i.e. large structures require a large population to make them. The idea of these structures being religious don't fit the evidence found thus far so shouldn't be put into that category - click here to read my theory]


The following is the more religious version of the theory of evolution (Christian source):

First, even though some people believe that evolution is correct, and that men evolved from animals, that does not make it right. People believe all kinds of things that are wrong. Humans did not "evolve," but were created specially by God (Genesis 1:26-27).

Second, the fact that a person lives in a cave has nothing to do with whether or not he or she is human. Saying that a man who lives in a cave is "half human" would be like saying a dog that lives in the house is "half human." The place where you live does not determine your "humanity."

Third, the Bible explains that people of the past lived in caves for various lengths of time, and for various reasons.

There are some attempts to bring together the religious idea of creationism with it's opposite, the theory of evolution. The basic theory tends to be along the lines of 'God create man with the capacity to evolve and change for various reasons and that is why we find so many variations of human beings in fossils'.

[Click here to read an excellent example of bringing together a faith based idea in-line with a modern scientific perspective]

Amongst some Christian religious scholars there is even an attachment to a literal interpretation of the meaning of the word "day" in the first two books of Genesis. Amongst the more reasonable and open minded this can be countered with a New Testament quote, "But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." 2 Peter 3:8

The Death Of Observational Science

The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive

Paleoanthropologist Chris Stringer shares his book, "Lone Survivors: How We Came to Be the Only Humans on Earth." (05:42)    

Notice how the above palaeontologist classifies people by brain size and species according to which region they live in. By that logic asians, whites, blacks, browns, aboriginal ... ALL represent different species of humans. This isn't a theory, it's a cult. Let me explain using simple images where you can see that different brain sizes or shapes of human being doesn't mean you're a different species. That seems to be a racist argument by the archaeologists of the 19th Century which has now become dogma. 

All ancient human classifications are based on a few fossils and the variations in skull shape and size seem to be within modern day variation of our species to some extant [there is also mention of a bone here or there which is supposed to be further evidence of an evolutionary change but the main arguments are based around the skull sizes and the size of the brain that these cranial cavities could hold]

"Archaic forms of Homo sapiens first appear about 500,000 years ago. The term covers a divers...e group of skulls which have features of both Homo erectus and modern humans. The brain size is larger than erectus and smaller than most modern humans, averaging about 1200 cc, and the skull is more rounded than in erectus. The skeleton and teeth are usually less robust than erectus, but more robust than modern humans. Many still have large brow ridges and receding foreheads and chins. There is no clear dividing line between late erectus and archaic sapiens, and many fossils between 500,000 and 200,000 years ago are difficult to classify as one or the other. "

Here is a graphic example of this theory (the one on the right is supposed to be Neanderthal)...

Picture
Is there a scientific theory to explain the huge variation in skull shapes and sizes in ancient humans and modern humans (of the various races)?

Yes
, for Neanderthals in particular but it applies to all theories connecting humans to apes and other species through skull sizes, for example: pygmies will have smaller heads than a gorilla but its doesn't mean a gorilla is smarter, ...
ScienceDaily (Aug. 16, 2007) — Chance, not natural selection, best explains why the modern human skull looks so different from that of its Neanderthal relative, according to a new study led by Tim Weaver, assistant professor of anthropology at UC"For 150 years, scientists have tried to decipher why Neanderthal skulls are different from those of modern humans," Weaver said. "Most accounts have emphasized natural selection and the possible adaptive value of either Neanderthal or modern human traits. We show that instead, random changes over the past 500,000 years or so – since Neanderthals and modern humans became isolated from each other – are the best explanation for these differences."

Weaver and his colleagues compared cranial measurements of 2,524 modern human skulls and 20 Neanderthal specimens, then contrasted those results with genetic information from a separate sample of 1,056 modern humans.


The scientists concluded that Neanderthals did not develop their protruding mid-faces as an adaptation to icy Pleistocene weather or the demands of using teeth as tools, and the retracted faces of modern humans are not an adaptation for language, as some anthropologists have proposed.


Instead, random "genetic drift" is the likeliest reason for these skull differences.

Problem with this skull size and shape theory is that these variations occur even today, yet according to archeologists we are supposed to be one species of humans of different races while the humans of the past are supposed to look like apes.

Take a look at examples of individuals with different skull sizes, both in one race and across different races. You can carry out these observations across many segments of modern populations and you will find these variations in skull size and shape are very common. Do you think we are all human or are we representing different species of people?
Picture
Dwayne Johnson (The Rock)
Picture
Image source
Picture
Image source
Picture
Image source
Picture
Image source
It should be obvious from the above images that skull shape and size is highly variable even in our time of 'homo sapian sapians' making that argument for a different human species untenable.

If we are to believe the nonsense that is coming out of the mouths of modern academics about Neanderthals (and with it early human history) then we would have to name Dwayne Johnson’s species Homo Rockathalis and Jackie Chan’s species Homo Chanathalis. Since the one with the bigger skull is the supposed to be the dumb one that means that Rockathalis is a dumb species (Note to The Rock: This is what the academics are saying not me). While Chanathalis is the smart one that has learned how to speak and cook. Shaq's comes from yet another Neanderthal type species. The whole theory of different species of humans that is now one species is just stupid (I would say it's outdated, but it became outdated in the 1960's, now it's just ridiculous)

History: The earliest evidence of culture 

When Archeologists do their digs looking for artifacts or fossils, they can only find what is made of stone or is preserved somehow as a fossil or frozen in ice. Accordingly we now have the most extensive collection of stone tools and weapons going back far into antiquity. This has led some to believe that stone was the only material all human races have ever used or maybe just the first material that we mastered which has led to the term ‘stone age’. Joseph Campbell mentions that wood is probably the oldest material humans have ever used as it’s easily available and is still used almost exclusively by hunter-gatherer groups that have survived to our age. It is also the easiest to re-use in another construction or for burning (firewood) and it is easily lost from our historical (archeological) record through decay.[note: can’t find the exact quote but have some more recent authoritive evidence] Could our earliest houses, weapons and even jewelry have been made of wood? After all, we don’t need stone to make an arrow or a spear.

Our recent archeological discoveries are simply mind-blowing and though there is currently no evidence of wooden jewelry or wooden musical instruments (how difficult would it be to make a wooden lute/guitar with a box and some appropriately prepared animal hair?) from our deep deep past, we may yet find some as the following presentation of evidence and examples will show.

Wood does decay but it also gets preserved by accident. First take a look at this 10,000 year old wooden spear-like object found in some melting ice:
Picture
Craig Lee, of the University of Colorado Boulder, holds a 10,000-year-old atlatl dart that had been frozen in an ice sheet near Yellowstone National Park. The dart was straight when it was entombed and became bowed from the melting and barely survived being snapped in half by a passing animal. What looked like a small branch that blew off a tree during a storm turned out to be an ancient wooden hunting weapon wielded by Paleo Indians. The 10,000-year-old atlatl dart was discovered in a melting patch of ice high in the Rocky Mountains close to Yellowstone National Park.

Next consider the wooden spears found even longer ago (400,000 years!)


Gamble cites wooden spears found preserved in a bog at Schöningen, Germany, and are associated with horse bones. Dated to 400,000 years ago, the spears provide the first hard evidence of human hunting and are weighted at the ends to be thrown like a javelin.


"I just wonder whether the Schöningen spears were ever used. Yes, there are horses at the site, but are the tips of the spears damaged? You'd think spears like that would break after they'd been jammed in a few horses," muses Gamble. For heidelbergensis, tools and hunting weapons may have played an important role in social display, one that we don't yet fully understand and may even border on ritual.


"They may have been more interested in making things as a demonstration of who they were and what was important to them. Killing horses was probably something they did once a week," Gamble remarks.


"It is very hard to get colleagues to accept evidence of ritual for early humans," says Bermúdez de Castro.   BBC

To say there are signs of ritual or culture is one thing but to actually begin to describe how they must have performed a possible ritual is a little absurd. To compare with modern tribes in some way to draw some logical conclusions about possible meanings of the rituals or possible lifestyles of ancient humans is more appropriate.

No matter what we now know that ancient man did use wood in hunting and probably in other spheres of life. Since wood is easiest to form or build with it is possible that every stone advance came after a development that was earlier and based in wood.

For example, check out this hunter-gatherer group, their 'huts' are made solely of wood and leaves;
Picture
They are not living in caves, (though I’m sure if they were facing horrible weather they would lose their housing and end up in any caves available to them) and their little thatched houses would rot away with time so that people living 10,000 years from now would find no evidence of them, plus if there is any change in environmental or geographical conditions they would provide great firewood. With the rise and fall of the ice ages (and local catastrophes that must have been associated with large changes in weather throughout history) such evidence of human culture would be completely wiped out.

The article explains;

Because humans lived as hunter-gatherers for 95 percent of their species' history, current foraging societies provide the best window for viewing human social evolution, according to the authors. Given that, the researchers focused on co-residence patterns among more than 5,000 individuals from 32 present-day foraging societies around the globe, including the Gunwinggu, Labrador Inuit, Mbuti, Apache, Aka, Ache, Agta and Vedda.

A major point in the study is that foraging bands contain several individuals completely unconnected by kinship or marriage ties, yet include males with a vested interest in the offspring of daughters, sisters and wives.

"The increase in human network size over other primates may explain why humans evolved an emphasis on social learning that results in cultural transmission," said Hill. "Likewise, the unique composition of human ancestral groups promotes cooperation among large groups of non-kin, something extremely rare in nature."

The group's findings appear in the paper "Co-Residence Patterns in Hunter-Gatherer Societies Show Unique Human Social Structure." It is the first published analyses of adult co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies based on census data rather than post-marital residence typologies, Hill noted.

Notice how flexible these groups of human are. They aren’t bound to a small tribe for life but rather a system of tribes that together form a large social system. Here we find a modern counterpart to what an ancient culture of small hunter-gatherer groups could look like.

In fact, even in the large cultural groupings of the North American Apaches or Sioux or Cherokee we can see possible echoes of an ancient system of cultural organization that maximized the resources of the land and the practice of the hunt by forming small groups that could live together without adversely affecting their food supply. They use stone but notice how much of their technology revolves around wood. At the same time these North American hunter-gatherers would have large social meetings where two or more small tribes celebrate some event. Could this be a practice that is natural to any human culture going back through the millennia?

What about the hunt? To hunt you need to track animal footprints, understand its habits, prepare a trap or have some skill in killing it effectively and have the ability to communicate this body of knowledge to youngsters, i.e. language. The Apache teach the whole role a youngster is expected to play using stories which we call their 'religion' or mythology. Every primitive tribe has such stories that explain and train the young ones. Why not ancient humans?

The theme of language and the hints of the existence of a human culture and society can be been clearly in the development of the hand ax, as Campbell explains;
Picture
Olduvai Handaxe
Indeed, some excavations (for example, those of L. S. B. Leakey at Olduvai Gorge in the north of Tanganyika) have revealed in perfect sequence every stage of the evolution of the hand ax from the pebble tools of man’s first beginnings to the finely finished, really elegant axes of the period of the Neanderthal. And if the view into the depth of the well of time that we obtained in the South of France was great, this of Olduvai is simply beyond speech. But what is even more amazing than the profundity of the prehistoric past here illustrated is the broad diffusion over the face of the earth of exactly the same ax forms as those of Paleolithic East Africa. As Dr. Carleton S. Coon has remarked: “During the quarter of a million years when man made these tools, the styles changed very little, but what changes were made are to be seen everywhere… This means that human beings who lived half a million years ago were able to teach their young skills that they had learned from their fathers in most minute detail, as living Australians and Bushmen do. Such teaching requires both speech and a firm discipline, and the uniformity of hand-ax styles over wide areas means that members of neighboring groups must have met together at stated intervals to perform together acts that require the use of these objects. In short, human society was already a reality when the hand-ax choppers of the world had begun to turn out a uniform product.

All of which speaks volumes for the force and reach of diffusion in the primitive world.


Moreover, what is perhaps more remarkable still is that some of the most beautiful of the symmetrically chipped hand axes of this period are as much as two feet long, a size too cumbersome for practical use; the only possible conclusion being that they must have served some ceremonial function . Professor Coon has suggested that such axes were not practical tools but sacred objects, comparable to the ceremonial tools and weapons of later days, “used only seasonally, when wild food was abundant enough to support hundreds of persons at one place and one time. Then the old men,” he supposes, “would cut the meat for the assembled multitude with some of these heavy and magnificent tools,” after which, like the magically powerful tjurungas of the Australians, the sacred implements would be stored in some holy place. Primitive Mythology by Joseph Campbell, Page 364
Picture
Giant Stone Axes 
In Campbell’s time the debate of when the human species first appeared on our planet was considered to be about a half a million years ago.

The African finds that have most recently stirred the halls of science are roughly (very roughly) dated at the commencement of the Pleistocene or Ice Age, circa 600,000 B.C.; and at the Fifth International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, held at the University of Pennsylvania in 1956, Dr. Raymond Dart of Witwatersrand University, Johannesburg, South Africa, showed a convincing series of slides in which the implements of this pre-lithic (pre-Stone Age) culture were illustrated. These included the lower jaw bones of large antelopes, which had been cut in half to be used as saws and knives; gazelle horns with part of the skull attached, which showed distinct signs of wear and tear use, possibly as digging tool; and a great number of ape-man palates with the teeth worn down – human palates being used to this day as scrapers by some of the natives of the area. Primitive Mythology by Joseph Campbell, Page 359

In our time evidence of the use of jaw bones of animals to cut and eat meat (indicating the hunt was developed) goes back even further. The following extracts bring Joseph Campbell’s archaeological survey up to date. The last article I’m presenting in full as I think that it represents the border of our current archaeological acceptance of the existence of a species that has the distinct behaviour patterns that can be called human. Hunting (involving tool making such as wooden spears, the need for speech for communication of the techniques of the hunt and passing on of the art of the hunt – i.e. how to make the spears/arrows(?) or just a way to trap an animal and drop rocks on it or push it over a cliff), walking upright and taking care of the members of the tribe. Lucy, whose people are at the forefront of archaeological theory as the possible first humans, was found in the geological layer indicating an age of about 3 million years. 

From About.com
The Stone Age (known to scholars as the Palaeolithic era) in human prehistory is the name given to the period between about 2.5 million and 20,000 years ago. It begins with the earliest human-like behaviours of crude stone tool manufacture, and ends with fully modern human hunting and gathering societies. The Palaeolithic is the earliest archaeology; anything older is palaeontology. Today scholars divide the Palaeolithic into three categories, more or less as follows. Lower Palaeolithic (sometimes called the Early Stone Age) The Lower Palaeolithic lasted between 2.5 million-200,000 years ago (or at least according to one permutation), and it was when the Hominin ancestors of human beings, including Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus and Homo ergaster, roamed most of the earth and began making the first stone tools.

ScienceDaily (Feb. 11, 2011) — A fossilized foot bone recovered from Hadar, Ethiopia, shows that by 3.2 million years ago human ancestors walked bipedally with a modern human-like foot, a report that appears Feb. 11 in the journal Science, concludes. The fossil, a fourth metatarsal, or midfoot bone, indicates that a permanently arched foot was present in the species Australopithecus afarensis, according to the report authors, Carol Ward of the University of Missouri, together with William Kimbel and Donald Johanson, of Arizona State University'sInstitute of Human Origins. The research helps resolve a long-standing debate between paleoanthropologists who think A. afarensis walked essentially as modern humans do and those who think this species practiced a form of locomotion intermediate between the quadrupedal tree-climbing of chimpanzees and human terrestrial bipedalism.
Picture
Ancient Cut Marks Reveal Far Earlier Origin of Butchery By Kate Wong

Researchers working in Ethiopia's remote Afar region have recovered evidence that humans began using stone tools and eating meat far earlier than previously thought. The finds—cut-marked animal bones dating to nearly 3.4 million years ago—push the origin of butchery back a stunning 800,000 years. Furthermore, these ancient butchers were not members of our own genus, Homo, but the more primitive Australopithecus, specifically A. afarensis, the species to which the celebrated Lucy fossil belongs.

Scientists have typically viewed tool use as the purview of Homo. Indeed, in 1964 Kenyan paleoanthropologist Louis Leakey and his colleagues named the earliest Homo species, H. habilis ("handy man"), for its association with stone tools. Subsequent finds have since extended the evidence of stone tool use back to between 2.5 million and 2.6 million years ago. But exactly which member of the human family made and wielded these older tools was unclear, both because no human remains turned up in direct association with the tools and animal bones, and more than one human species lived in the area at this time. The earliest example of a clear association between humans and tools dated to 2.3 million years ago, and the human remains belonged to an early Homo species.

Still, archaeologists suspected that earlier stone tools remained to be discovered, because these examples seemed too advanced to represent humanity's first foray into tool manufacture. "Nearly everyone that works with the earliest stone tool industries at between 2.3 [million] and 2.5 million years has commented on the surprisingly high level of skill and understanding that we see in these early knappers. Most have predicted that something older will be found," says archaeologist Shannon P. McPherron of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.

That hunch helped motivate McPherron and his colleagues, who have been working at a site in the Afar region called Dikika—just a few kilometers from the Lucy site—to look in older geologic deposits in the area for earlier evidence of stone tool use or manufacture. They were rewarded with bones from two animals—one cow-size and another goat-size—that display cutmarks and percussion marks indicative of flesh removal and marrow extraction with stone tools. McPherron, along with Dikika Research Project leader Zeresenay Alemseged of the California Academy of Sciences and their collaborators, describe their discovery in an August 12 paper in Nature (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group).

Because the earliest Homo remains date to just 2.3 million years ago, scientists can be certain that an australopithecine made the cut marks on the 3.4-million-year-old Dikika bones. And because the only human species that is known to have lived in the Dikika area during this time period is A. afarensis, it seems reasonably certain that this species in particular butchered the bones. (The A. afarensis remains found at Dikika include a spectacularly well-preserved skeleton of a youngster, popularly dubbed "Lucy's baby.")

Australopithecines had teeth and jaws that were in many ways adapted for eating fruit, seeds and other plant foods. "[The discovery] shows that meat was added to the diet earlier than we had thought," McPherron observes, although he notes that it is difficult to say what portion of the diet was meat. "We could now be looking at an extended period of time when hominins were including meat in their diet and experimenting with the use of stone tools."

Although the Dikika finds prove that A. afarensis was using tools, whether they were fashioning implements from stone or just picking up sharp-edged rocks from the landscape and using those to carve up the carcasses remains unknown, because no stone tools have turned up at the site. Future discoveries may resolve this question. They may also reveal the extent to which Lucy and her kin relied on stone gadgetry, setting the stage for developments that would profoundly impact the course of human evolution.

"This discovery dramatically shifts the known time frame of a game-changing behavior for our ancestors,"Alemseged remarked in a prepared statement. "Tool use fundamentally altered the way our early ancestors interacted with nature, allowing them to eat new types of food and exploit new territories. It also led to tool-making—a critical step in our evolutionary path that eventually enabled such advanced technologies as airplanes, MRI machines and iPhones."

History: The earliest evidence of ritual and myth 

Joseph Campbell writes in Primitive Mythology:

In Dreachenloch and Wildermannlisloch little walls of stone, up to 32 inches high, formed a kind of bin, within which a number of cave-bear skulls had been carefully arranged. Some of these skulls had little stones arranged around them; others were set on slabs; one, very carefully placed, had the long bones of a cave bear (no doubt its own) placed beneath its snout, another had the long bones pushed through the orbits of its eyes.

The cave in Germany, Petershohle, near Velden, which was explored by Konrad Hormann from 1916 to 1922, had closet like niches in the walls, which contained five cave-bear skulls – and once again the leg bones.

Now the cave bear, it must be told, for all its size, was not an extremely dangerous beast. In the first place, it was not carnivorous but herbivorous, and in the second place, like all bears it had to go to sleep in the winter. But during the ice age the winters were long. The bears would go into the caves to sleep and, while there, could be readily killed. In fact, a tribe of men living in the front part of a cave with a couple of sleeping bears in the rear would have had there a kind of living deep freeze. (Page 339)


The following article show us a little about the evidence we have of cave bears;
Picture
ScienceDaily (Aug. 25, 2010) — The cave bear started to become extinct in Europe 24,000 years ago, but until now the cause was unknown. An international team of scientists has analysed mitochondrial DNA sequences from 17 new fossil samples, and compared these with the modern brown bear. The results show that the decline of the cave bear started 50,000 years ago, and was caused more by human expansion than by climate change.

There is evidence that one species of bear has survived over another simply because they didn't live in caves as a normal part of their behavior pattern. Could this be because of the ancient cave bear cult that hunted this species of bear to extinction?

"The present day brown bear did not suffer the same fate and has survived until today for one simple reason -- brown bears did not depend so heavily on the cave habitat, which was becoming degraded, and this is why they did not follow the same pattern as the cave bears.

"Brown bears rely on less specific shelters for hibernation. In fact, their fossil remains are not very numerous in cave deposits," the Galician researcher says. The definitive extinction of the cave bear "broadly" coincides with the last cooling of the climate during the Pleistocene (between 25,000 and 18,000 years ago), which may have led to a reduction in shelter and the vegetation that the animals fed on.

The cave bear inhabited Europe during the Late Pleistocene and became definitively extinct around 24,000 years ago, although it held out for a few thousand years longer in some areas, such as the north west of the Iberian Peninsula, than in other places. This ursid was a large animal, weighing 500 kg on average, and was largely a herbivore. The bear hibernated in the depths of limestone caves, where the remains of individuals that died during hibernation slowly accumulated over time."


This suggests the possibility that if there was a ritual being played out in the ancient tribes of hunting the cave bear then there would be a large continuum of this culture with obvious signs of thier passing. And there is:

Vestiges of a circumpolar Paleolithic cult of the bear have been identified throughout the arctic, from Finland and Northern Russia, across Siberia and Alaska, to Labrador and Hudson Bay: among the Finns and Lapps, Ostyaks and Vogul, Orotchi of the Amur river region, Gilyaks, Goldi, and peoples of Kamchatka; the Nootka, Tlingit, Kwakiutl, and others of the Northwest American Coast; and the Algonquins of the Northeast. And so here is a northern circumpolar hunting continuum in counterpoise to tha broad equatorial planting belt which we traced from Sudan to the Amazon in Part Two. And just as there a certain depth of time was indicated, going back to perhaps c. 7500 B.C., the dawn of the proto-neolithic, so here too there is a depth in time – but how very much greater! For in the high Alps, in the neighborhood of St. Gallen, and again in Germany, some thirty miles northwest of Nurnberg, near Velden, a series of caves containing the ceremonial arranged skulls of a number of cave bears have been discovered, dating from the period (it is almost incredible!) of Neanderthal Man.(Joseph Campbell, Primitive Mythology page 339)

Here we come to the amazing possibility that Neanderthals could be JUST another race of human beings. Well, its kind of implied in the earliest signs of culture that there might be a continuous cultural continuum from ancient times to our own age but this is the first evidence we have of genuine culture and mythological thought. Before I begin my analysis of the evidence of deep thought in some human species, that may have been our evolutionary cousins, I would like to point out one simple fact; Whatever an artist's preconceptions of the Neanderthal lifestyle and intelligence may be it is likely that this perspective gets reflected into their illustrations of Neanderthals. Consider the following portrayals of ancient Neanderthal Man. 
First a video that had my sides splitting with laughter... I call this one the Klingon version of "Neanderthals". For over 150 years, researchers have been puzzled by the extinction of Neanderthals.
Picture
Example 1
Picture
Example 2
Picture
Example 3
Picture
Example 4 
Picture
Example 5
This one isn't a piece of art, it's evidence from a DNA test which is mind blowing:

Some Neandertals may have had red hair and pale skin, just as some modern humans do, according to a new genetic study.

The traits were likely more common in European Neandertals (often spelled Neanderthals), just as they are often seen in modern humans of European descent.


[The woman in this video (Jenna Lee) fits the above description for Neanderthals, so I thought I would add her as a possible example of a Neanderthal woman - keeping in mind that the genetics from those times have been diluted quite a bit, but there still could easily have been red-haired women who weren't 6 feet tall with sloping foreheads.] 


Again and again, we discover "anomalies" (stuff that makes no sense). Rather than covering it up, pretending it doesn't exist, sending up one satillite after another to Mars and forgetting to add a simple scooper to test for life (even though water on Mars is now confirmed... and was ALWAYS a part of the theory of how the Martian surface came to be that way)...

The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive

Wednesday June 25, 2008: Neil deGrasse Tyson explained at 5 minutes that the Mars Rover is only looking for conditions where life COULD exist even-though on earth there is ALWAYS life where there is water. Recently the rover sent with all it's sophisticated sensing equipment ... ALSO, didn't carry a simple test for life. At what point do we say, "OK, enough. What have you guys found that yall are not telling us about?".
Picture
From CNN:
At first glance, team leader and commercial diver Peter Lindberg joked that his crew had just discovered an unidentified flying object, or UFO.

"I have been doing this for nearly 20 years so I have a seen a few objects on the bottom, but nothing like this," said Lindberg.

The Nazca Lines in the desert only make sense if you realize they are meant to be seen from above. Far, far above. Some of the species of animals drawn in the Nazca desert don't even exist in the region. Rather than assume these drawings were for religious purposes or alien landing runways... doesn't it just make more sense that our last big civilization achieved space flight? Doesn't that make sense as to why we are constantly sending satellites to Mars that are getting more and more sophisticated (including infra-red which was used to find the buried Pyramids in Egypt - see at the top/into of this post) ... but publicaly say they are only testing for one or two things. It just seems like a VERY serious waste of money... unless they found something already. 

Picture
Nazca Monkey
Picture
Nazca Spider
Picture
Nazca "Astronaut" 
1 Comment

Plato 2: Morality, Loyalty To The State & Democracy

11/18/2012

0 Comments

 
"The really important thing is not to live, but to live well" - Socrates (from The Crito - 48 b)
A little history and the topic of this dialogue:

From the "Introduction", Huntington Cairns...

Nearly a month elapsed between Socrates's condemnation and execution, a delay not at all in accordance with Athenian custom. The day before the trial, however, a state galley had been sent on a sacred annual mission and until it returned no one could be to death. For various reasons the mission took longer than usual, and Socrates' friends used the time to make a plan for getting him out of prison and away from Athens.

The evening before the Crito opens the galley has been sighted, and very early on the following morning Socrates' old and devoted friend, Crito, comes to the prison to lay the plan before him and beseech him to let his friends save him. It will be easy to bribe his jailers. He himself has far more money than will be needed, and there are many others who are eager to contribute. Athens is not the only place where Socrates can live happily. He will find friends wherever he goes.

To this Socrates answers by asking him if it can ever be right to defend oneself against evil by doing evil. Granted that it was unjust to condemn him to death, can it be right for him to escape by breaking the law? What will happen to a state if individual men are able to set aside laws? A man must always do what his country orders him unless he can change her view of what the law should be.

" If you leave the city, Socrates, ' the laws argue, 'you shall return wrong for wrong and evil, breaking your agreements and covenants with us, and  injuring those whom you least ought to injure  - yourself, your friends, your country, and us."

That my dear friend Crito, I do assure you, is what I seem to hear then saying ... and the sound of thier arguments rings so loudly in my head that i cannot hear the other side. However, if you think you will do any good by it, say what you like."

"Socrates, I have nothing to say."

"Then, Crito, let us follow this course, since God points out the way."


[All extracts of The Crito are from: The Collected Dialogues of Plato - Including The Letters, Edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns with Introduction and Prefatory Notes - Bollingen Series LXXI ]

This was the question that Socrates was dealing with in the month before he drank his hemlock...

To this Socrates answers by asking him if it can ever be right to defend oneself against evil by doing evil. Granted that it was unjust to comdemn him to death, can it be right for him to escape by breaking the law? What will happen to a state if individual men are able to set aside laws? A man must always do what his country orders him unless he can change her view of what the law should be.

Note that Socrates spent a whole month talking to his 'followers' (not dumb and cultlike such as Fox News plumbers/followers but rich, educated & intelligent).

[51 b] Socrates: Do you not realize that you are even more bound to respect and placate the anger of your country than your father's anger?

This is actually normal to a degree. Throughout history, integrated tribes, have used a transition method to help boys move into adulthood/manhood. breaking them away from dependency on thier mother and transferring this attachment to the group. A remnant of this still exists in the Jewish culture though it has little psychological effect (a woman gets her period and is thus brought into adulthood by nature itself. Men have to do more work). This knowledge has been mostly lost but it is used in the armies to consolidate thier group and focus them into a unit. Problem is they are not transitioned into civilian life. Living in the army isn't living the same as a living as a civilian. Any expert that says otherwise needs to be put on lie detectors.

The transition from the human group to the State is what bothers me most. In the group there is still human contact. But when your faith moves into an abstract concept then you fight over land, money and women. The way bulls fight during mating season. Anyways, having a State itself is necessary for Self-Government & Liberty. As long as it's a functioning of Democracy that is understood and not just paid lip service to.

In Ancient Greece people were still connected to each other through human energy AND their whole philosophy on life involved being as good as you can be at EVERYTHING in your life. Now we have divided life into categories like the ancient caste system of India (which was initially flexible and became rigid only over time). Dividing our lives into categories and being overly attached to abstract ideas and institutions, detached from normal human empathy, can't possibly be good. Can it?

[52 b] Socrates (speaking rhetorically) : They would say, Socrates, we have substantial evidence that you are satisfied with us and with the state. You would not have been so exceptionally reluctant to cross the borders of your country if you had not been exceptionally attached to it. You have never left the city to attend any festival or for any other purpose, except on some military expedition. You have never travelled abroad as other people do, and you have never felt the impulse to acquaint yourself with another country or constitution. You have been content with us and with our city. You have definitely chosen us and undertaken to observe us in all your activities as a citizen, and as crowning proof that you are satisfied with our city, you have begotten children in it. Furthermore, even at the time of your trial you could have proposed the penalty of banishment, if you had chosen to do so - that is, you could have done then with the sanction of the state what you are now trying to do without it. But whereas at that time you made a noble show of indifference if you had to die, and in fact preferred death, as you said, to banishment, now you show no respect for your earlier professions, and regard for us, the laws, whom you are trying to destroy. You are behaving like the lowest type of menial, trying to run away in spite of contracts and undertakings by which you agreed to live as a member of our state. 

I think Socrates may have been overcompensating with his loyalty to his City State (back then, in ancient Greece, every city was it's own State and had it's own government). It could be that Socrates was originally an immigrant as immigrant are the most likely to overcompensate by being loyal like a dog (i.e. loyalty no matter how mean you are to them, how much you beat them or how much you torture them. A pet dog will remain loyal through ALL of this).

If your State is violating it's own Constitution and morality then it becomes your moral duty to fight it. Either overtly (public debate) or covertly (private discussion). If Socrates had left Athens and established himself elsewhere then, in time, he could have possibly changed that law and mob justice may have been less powerful than it is today as ALL of western thought is founded on Plato (The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.
Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality, p. 39 [Free Press, 1979]).

Anyways, it was in his Apology that we first hear about Socrates's solo fight against his own 'enemies of the constitution'. Another example of history repeating itself.

"Naturally, every age thinks that all ages before it were prejudiced, and today we think this more than ever and are just as wrong as all previous ages that thought so. How often have we not seen the truth condemned! It is sad but unfortunately true that man learns nothing from history." - Carl Jung

For example, study this case study on the 'enemies of the constitution' , i.e. covert actions of the US that is not only Un-Constitutional but also puts thier own citizens and world peace at risk. Then ask yourself, if you are loyal to your group/country laws to the point of betraying future generations to a life of murder and mayhem... are you truly being loyal to your country? In any case, it may be given the cultural situation of that time Socrates made the right choice that led to stabilization of his culture. We will never know. But we do know that when his city's Constitution was threatened by tyrants he was the ONLY one to stand against mass opinion. So overly submissive loyalty to the "State" may not have been his real problem. It may have been that he was just too hurt by his fellow Athenians prejudice to leave and decided that dying by thier hands would be best to teach them that mob justice isn't justice at all.

Tools To Understand Democracy & Despotism from Encyclopedia Britannica.

"... a great many people who don't know you and me very well will be sure to think that I let you down, because I could have saved you if I had been willing to spend the money. And what could be more contemptible than to get a name for thinking more of money than your friends? Most people will never believe that it was you who refused to leave this place although we tried our hardet to persuade you.

Socrates: But my dear Crito, why should we pay so much attention to what 'most people' think? The really reasonable people, who have more claim to be considered, will believe that the facts are exactly as they are.

Crito: You can see for yourself, Socrates, that one has to think of popular opinion as well. Your present position is quite enough to show that the capacity of ordinary people for causing trouble is not confined to petty annoyances, but has hardly any limits if you once get a bad name with them."
44 c & d

True. Just see how Rush Limbaugh is so effective. Summary...

The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive

The above Rush Limbaugh example shows that there is literally a market for stereotypes and bigotry with an angry tone (a 'self-righteousness') and that he is either still on drugs or he is in need of psychiatric care. Rush Limbaugh is living proof that one of the gravest threats to Democracy and Peace are idiots with microphones funded by multi-billion dollar corporations/people. Related: [Bot Bites] Do You Support The Newt-Cain-Limbaugh Slut Train?

The following extract represents, what I think, is the source of what Jesus meant when said 'Turn Thy Cheek':

{Plato's dialogues have obviously been a part of the global marketplace conversation since they were written, in the middle-east as well as in the west through merchants as they did all the travelling and would converse with each other. When the merchants returned to thier homelands they took thier new found knowledge/experience with them and told others. It's how the United States became half Native. Conflict and Alexander's conquest and the subsequent spreading of Greek Institutions/Lyceums thought the Ancient World was also a big factor.}

So, in a sense, ALL of modern thought... all over the world, is rooted in ancient ideas outlined in Plato's works!


[49 a] Socrates: Do we say that one must never willingly do wrong, or does it depend upon circumstances? Is it true, as we have often agreed before, that there is no sense in which wrongdoing is good or honourable  Or have we jettisoned all our former convictions in these last few days? Can you and I at our age, Crito, have spent all these years in serious discussions without realizing that we were no better than a pair of children? Surely the truth is just what we have always said. Whatever the popular view is, and whether the alternative is pleasanter than the present one or even harder to bear, the fact remains that to do wrong is in every sense bad and dishonourable for the person who does it. Is that our view, or not?

Crito: Yes, it is.

Socrates: Then in no circumstances must one do wrong.

Crito: No.

Socrates: In that case one must not even do wrong when one is wrong, which most people regard as the natural course.

Crito: Apparently not.


Notice that in this paragraph Socrates is arguing for COMPLETE morality (Karen Armstrong called this the "axis" age because this is when the whole Ancient World became the crux of a revolution away from superstitious magick and towards personal responsibility and morality. Siddhartha talked about the same morality in his 8 fold path as the rest of the moral philosophers of that age). By this logic, 'An eye for an eye' was just meant to minimize revenge attacks/killings by telling people that if you are attacked... NOT seeking revenge beyond what was done to you. For example; In the Old Testament you see that tribes of that time - i.e. 2000-500 BC - used to kill everyone in the village/town that they didn't like or as revenge, a problem Israel may have inherited, (so this may have been an ancient moral method to limit blood lust):.

Deuteronomy 20:16: "However, in the cities of the nations the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes."

1 Samuel 15:2-4
2 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt.
3 Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.
4 And Saul gathered the people together, and numbered them in Telaim, two hundred thousand footmen, and ten thousand men of Judah.

Psalm 137:8-9: "O daughter of Babylon, O destroyed one, O the happiness of him who repayeth to thee thy deed, That thou hast done to us. O the happiness of him who doth seize, And hath dashed thy sucklings on the rock!"

Hosea 13:16 (King James) Samaria will bear her guilt because she has rebelled against her God.
They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to pieces, and their pregnant women ripped open.

Numbers 31: 17-18" "Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

Related: Rick Santorum, Paul Ryan, Todd Atkin Of "The Party Of Rape & War"

The problem is people make decisions emotionally and not only does anger cloud judgement it also destroysthe ability to think. 


There is an ancient story of "the Black Knight". When Ali, nephew of the Prophet Mohammed (P.B.U.H.), was fighting he reached a point where he was about to kill an enemy in black armor. Just when he was about to strike the black knight spit on him. Ali stopped and walked away. Why? Because he didn't want to strike while angry... and being spit on made him angry. [Source: Rumi's Mathnawi] 

The following paragraph explains why you must listen to experts. 

Socrates: Was it always right to argue that some opinions should be taken seriously but not others? (46 d)

Some thinkers, I believe have always held some view as the one which I mentioned just now, that some of the opinions which people entertain should be respected, and others should not. Now I ask you, Crito, don't you think that this is a sound principle? You are safe from the prospect of dying tomorrow, in all human probability, and you are not likely to have your judgement upset by this impending calamity. Consider, then, don't you think that this is a sound enough principle, that one should not regard all the opinions that people hold, but only some and not others? What do you say? Isn't that a fair statement?

Crito: Yes it is.

Socrates: In other words, one should regard the good ones and not the bad?

Crito: Yes.

Socrates: The opinions of the wise being good, and the opinions of the foolish bad?

Crito: Naturally.

Socrates: To pass on, then, what do you think of the sort of illustration that I used to employ? When a man is in training, and taking it seriously, does he pay attention to all praise and criticism and opinion indiscriminately, or only when it comes from the one qualified person, the actual doctor or trainer?

Crito: Only when it comes from the one qualified person.

Socrates: Then he should be afraid of the criticism and welcome the praise of the one qualified person, but not those of the general public?

Crito: Obviously.


The logic is simple and self-explanatory. for example; If you visit a farm you have to learn from an expert (the farmer) how to milk a cow. If you have car trouble you need someone with mechanical expertise. When testing water or your backyard for pollutants/toxins you need the expertise of a biologist/lab-expert to test the water and soil. To think you know something simply because you can think it, is dumb but has always been a problem of civilization.

If you want the truth about media manipulation/lies/propaganda, to discover whether there is "hypnosis" going on in US Media... you have to ask an expert on communication, hypnosis & NLP. (BTW, the answer to that one is YES! - for the USA - as it'smedia is controlled by a tiny group that supports a minority while calling themselves the 49%). i.e. 49% of people voted GOP even though ALL GOP policies are bad for everyone EXCEPT millionaires and billionairs. For such a party platform to even exist you need a large following of people who will listen without question and do your bidding... even when they think they are opposing you, i.e. they are in a deep trance state (hypnosis).

Fox News has a cult following of people who won't even listen to ANY other news source if they don't like the title or topic. But even if they did, the GOP controls almost all of the News Media directly or indirectly. For example; A confirmed ally of Bush-Cheney sits on the Time-Warner board. Also, since all news media have consolidated into a tiny number of corporations, whose owners all know each other and seem to be friends, it's possible to create an echo chamber of misinformation either all the time OR some of the time, since sometimes it's more useful to create two opposing views and have each group fight each other. {example 1 of echo chambers and example 2}. 

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

"Republican's and thier revenue sources own 90% of media."  Senator Bernie Sanders
Picture
CHART from Mother Jones: Americans didn’t intend to elect a Republican majority to the House of Representatives. But thanks to GOP-engineered redistricting, they did. 

Related: Tools To Understand Democracy & Despotism from Encyclopedia Britannica.
The most notable problem in US media is that the GOP just used money to take over Congress with a minority vote... and NO ONE but a magazine labelled 'left leaning', is talking about it. How is stealing the House a left leaning issue? Such madness is only possible when a small group of people control AND direct media conversation which in turn shapes public opinion. Hitler & his Nazis were experts at this method. The GOP is following in thier footsteps... and not just because all of Hitler's scientists ended up in the new Neo-Nazi homeland (Texas) but they are using the actual methods! (especially the one where if you repeat a lie often enough people come to believe it). The simply reality is that if the News Media has shaped US Mass Opinion, then it can also be used to dismantle it. We should restart by dismantling US Corporate Media... beginning with Fox "News".

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

MOMENT OF ZEN: Fox News gets upset because a democrat used their own 'Nazi' tactic on them
0 Comments

Using "The Middle Path" (Buddhist Philosophy) For Peace Of Mind.

11/15/2012

0 Comments

 
1. This is Buddhism...
Picture
i.e. Siddhartha (later called 'The Buddha' or 'Enlightened One') just taught a philosophy.

2. Real Buddhists don't worship idols...
Picture
 (Image source)
Early "images"/sculptures of the Buddha were empty of him... actual images of Siddhratha as "The Buddha" emerged in later centuries The "throne" is empty because according to Siddhartha "The Self" didn't exist, it was your own creation.

The Nature Of The "Self"

In ancient India a concept developed called ‘Maya’ which means illusion. Since the world is considered impermanent and constantly changing - and you can interpret it in many ways with your mind - it is considered to be an illusion. Thus a common, though ancient, psychological perspective on 'attachment': if you hold on to it as your psychological/mental foundation, you are holding on to something that will dissolve away - eventually - so you are holding on to something which is inherently unstable.

Note: The ancient idea of the world/universe as an 'illusion' has re-emerged in modern physics as the idea of the world and universe as a hologram from string theory (approx 5 minutes into following video)...

The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive

Siddhartha (Buddha) agreed with the basic premise of ancient Indian philosophy that the world is an illusion... but he took it one step further, claiming that not only is the world an illusion, so is the ’self’. (Impermanence)

To put it in other words; you are not the person you were a year ago. You know this. You can probably see the ways in which you’ve changed and grown over the last year. You probably see the world in a different way then you did a year ago (or ten years ago). Since you see the world differently, you have a different image of yourself as well. You define yourself differently than you did 10 years ago. What you are capable of, what you can do, who you are, all these definitions tend to change for every person - given enough time. The ancient philosophers noticed that as soon as you imagine a event happening to you - or your role in any situation - you first have to place yourself in it (i.e. you have to imagine your role or character) then you decide what to do or how to feel (this all tends to happen very fast for most events). In other words, every time you imagine yourself or a situation that you are in you are, in a sense, recreating yourself.

Scientific American Mind magazine in an interview with the Nobel laureate Neuroscientist Eric Kandel (click here to read article)

Mind: We tend to think of memory as a kind of library that holds a record of events and facts that can be retrieved as needed. Is this an accurate metaphor? Kandel: No, memory is not like that at all. Human memory reinvents itself all the time. Every time you remember something, you modify it a little bit, in part dependent on the context in which you recall it. That is because the brain’s storage is not as exact as written text. It is always a mixture of many facades of the past event: images, pictures, feelings, words, facts and fiction—a “re-collection” in the true sense.Modern nuero-science agrees with the Buddhist idea of an impermanent self. As Eric Kandel points out that, “Every time you remember something, you modify it a little bit, in part dependent on the context in which you recall it.”

In other words you recreate your image of yourself to fit the new situation. If the self was something permanent and real, then your image of yourself would always remain the same. The fact that you can consciously or unconsciously change your image of yourself and react to situations in a new way - or just create a new you - proves that the self is something you make up as part of living in society. What does this mean? This means that you are not limited to being any particular ’self’ or person. If you feel like you have low self-esteem you can change that self. If you feel like you are not comfortable is social situations, you can change that image too. Any limiting image you have of yourself can be changed as you create your 'self' or how you want to be.

Dalai Lama: Disturbing emotions not only disturb our own state of mind, they also disturb the minds of others. Self-centredness gives rise to fear and insecurity, which in turn creates distrust. This is why having an altruistic attitude brings a great sense of happiness and peace of mind.

The Dalai Lama is supposed to be 'an incarnation of compassion' and is essentially a Buddhist Monk which he has claimed on TV as well. Buddhism & the Dalai Lama are subject to changing thier minds as science advances to fit thier practices in accordance with modern knowledge. I'm pretty sure I can prove through physics that reincarnation doesn't exist. But this is a blog post for another time.

I'm Buddhist NOT Tibetan. I discovered Buddhism (and chi kung) through my studies. The middle path is illustrated in Rumi's Mathnawi which are still books that I learn from and they have stories I use. Rumi's Mathnawi is available in the public domain (i.e. free for anyone to download)...

Rumi's Mathnawi Books 1 & 2

Rumi's Mathnawi Books 3 & 4

Rumi's Mathnawi Books 5 & 6


Note that Rumi teaches what was, essentially, taught by Jesus...

Matthew 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” 37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.



For the psychology of balance or 'the middle path' today, you don't have to look much farther than the Dalai Lama who is not only an expert but is also a leader...


“If a problem is fixable, if a situation is such that you can do something about it, then there is no need to worry. If it's not fixable, then there is no help in worrying. There is no benefit in worrying whatsoever.” 
― Dalai Lama

“Be empty of worrying. Think of who created thought! Why do you stay in prison When the door is so wide open?” ― Rumi, The Essential Rumi


The Buddhist psychology that the Dalai Lama has expressed thus far has been in line with what I know of psychology studied Carl Jung and meditational techniques so I consider him to be an expert on Buddhist Psychology for our age.

Every culture and religion has its sayings and aphorisms that help thier people related to thier environment. One aspect of these teachings are 'the psychology of balance' or 'the middle path'. A path explained by Siddhartha and was obviously held in very high esteem by the Ancient ascetics and mystics. Though asceticism by it's very nature tends to be polaristic, the meditation of the yogis (and of Siddhartha) was obviously being followed by the early Christian Desert Fathers and some of the Ancient Jewish prophets {or mystics i.e. read the Kabbalah... or don't (if you're Jewish as it's not allowed till you're 40.)}.If you do want to go into the Kabblah you could start with the Zohar (which was probably written by Ibn Arabi. Many of the scholars of those ages could speak in more than one symbolic language).

In Islam there is a Hadith (which I can't find right now) along the lines of 'The Prophet (P.B.U.H) heard Hazrat Umar and Hazrat Abu Bakr reciting the Holy Quran. He asked Umar why he was reciting the Quran so load and he replied to chase away the devil. He then asked Abu Bakr was he was reciting the Holy Quran so softly (forgot the reply)'. Finally, Mohammed (P.B.U.H) said something along the lines of 'do not read the Quran too loud or too softly. Follow the middle path.' {BTW, Mohammed (P.B.U.H) was also well known for spending days meditating in his cave. Meditation was big in the Deserts of the middle east.}

Note: "The Middle Path" means NOT to go to one extreme or another. Not too hot or too cold. Don't get too happy or too angry. Always stay in the middle or roughly in the middle.


Buddhism As A Philosophy...

"Naturally, every age thinks that all ages before it were prejudiced, and today we think this more than ever and are just as wrong as all previous ages that thought so. How often have we not seen the truth condemned! It is sad but unfortunately true that man learns nothing from history." - Carl Jung

Synopsis: Stephen Batchelor defines “Awakening” as awareness of yourself and your surroundings that expands over time with disciplined practice. He rewrites the Buddhist creed of "Life IS Suffering" and the "Cause of suffering IS craving" to "Anguish is to be understood, its origins to be let go of, its cessation to be realized, and the path to be cultivated."

In doing this he changes the perspective of Buddhism from believing that life itself is only about suffering to the idea that it is your mind and its incessant desires are the reason for this suffering. This effectively changes the emphasis from something beyond your control to something within your control. That is the difference between Buddhism as a philosophy and Buddhism as a religion.

One of his students asked Buddha, "Are you the messiah?"
"No", answered Buddha.
"Then are you a healer?"
"No", Buddha replied.
"Then are you a teacher?" the student persisted.
"No, I am not a teacher."
"Then what are you?" asked the student, exasperated.
"I am awake", Buddha replied.


The first written records of Siddhartha (Later called the Buddha) come from Siri Lanka (an island off the coast of South India), several hundred miles from where he taught. Like many other figures of mythology, his teachings were first written down well after his death, about 300 years later, so the reality of his teachings were already well mixed with local religious ideas and mythology.

I like this book because the author separates the meditational philosophy of balance/awakening from the religious beliefs.

This makes the practice of awareness/awakening something that a person of any religious persuasion can learn and apply.

For example, Siddhartha basically taught that,

"Anguish is to be understood, its origins to be let go of, its cessation to be realized, and the path to be cultivated."

Or in other words, the root of anguish is desiring life to something other than it is. Accepting life as it is helps release anguish.

When this becomes, "Life IS Suffering" and the "Cause of suffering IS craving" then the philosophy of cultivating awareness becomes a belief system to be followed. This is where Buddhism becomes a religion.

During Siddhartha's lifetime many people were able to attain awareness and "awakening" but after his death it became something to be strived for and rarely, if ever, achieved. Why has it become so hard to attain awakening? Because turning

Buddhism into a religion made it's tenants "Holy", something well above ordinary reality. So following the teachings as a practice of expanding awareness switched to one of devotion.

The Buddhists explain this lack of "enlightenment" in modern religious Buddhism as an example of the degradation of humanity over time. That is the common excuse for any religious person to explain why the tenets of their religion are NOT followed in society AND can never be followed until 'the end days'. This effectively removes moral responsibility for their actions as a society, as it is not the practitioners fault but life itself that makes enlightenment/awakening/peace impossible.

"An unawakened existence, in which we drift unaware on a surge of habitual impulses, is both ignoble and undignified. Instead of a natural and non-coercive authority, we impose our will on others either through manipulation and intimidation or by appealing to the opinions of those more powerful than ourselves. Authority becomes a question of force rather than integrity."


Living for momentary pleasures makes a person jump from one thing to another rarely finding complete satisfaction in one thing - always looking for the next ‘high’. This high can be social company, excessive exercise, drinking, drugs (both illegal and legal ones) etc. Letting go of craving can free us, even if it is only momentarily. That is why the path must be cultivated.


Experiment


Sit comfortable and consciously relax all the muscles in your body. Begin from your scalp and work your way down to your toes. Now become aware of your breath and as you maintain the focus on your breathing ALSO become aware of the surface you are sitting on, the cloths on your body, your surroundings and even the dome of the sky stretching off to the horizon. Be aware of your breathing and all of the above simultaneously.


If you can do the above only for a few seconds that is fine. You just have experienced 'expanded awareness'. Many people who try this will recognize the awareness they are experiencing from a previous experience. Yes, humans are 'mystical' creatures. Awakening, no matter how much it is avoided, is intrinsically a part of everyone AND is something that ANYONE can learn.

As a global culture we fix ourselves in 'palaces' of what is familiar and secure. We sense there is more to life than trying to gratify our desires and defend ourselves from fear. Yet we don’t know how to get their and this leads to even more activities of distraction.

For Example; We all know that the only certainty in life is death. If we keep the inevitability of death on our minds many things we worry about will no longer matter. Instead we try to avoid that thought at all costs to the point where when we encounter death we are shocked and terrified and say, 'his/her time came early'. There is no such thing. Without the perspective of our death how can we possibly make short or long term decisions that aren’t influenced by drowning ourselves in momentary pleasures?


"Since no one knows the future,
who can tell him what is to come?

No man has power over his spirit to retain it,
so no one has power over the day of his death."

Ecclesiastes 8:7-8:8


Death is always there waiting for you, every day of your life. It is sad, depressing, part of the sorrow of life, but it is not 'early'.

What is life? It is the flash of a firefly in the night. It is the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset. - Blackfoot

Since death is certain, avoiding it makes you avoid life itself.

Think about it. How do you know that someone is alive? By the simple fact that he/she is not dead. In other words, death defines life. Without death we would not know what life is. So by avoiding the acceptance of death we become escapists of life itself. Chasing momentary pleasures to cloud our awareness and our fears.

If you are constantly making life to be some perfect image to be attained at some point in the future, you will ALWAYS be chasing that image. If you cannot be content now you will never be content as there will always be something else you 'need' before you can be happy. A bigger car, a bigger house, a plane? This will give a rush of excitement followed by boredom with your new toy and craving for the next one.

This doesn't mean you shouldn't enjoy expensive things just that you should be happy first or nothing you get will ever satisfy you. (“Be bountiful and multiply”)

If you jump from one emotion to another, blindly avoiding pain and seeking pleasure with no awareness or separation from your emotions THEN your emotions will control you. You will be a slave to your desire. Anyone who knows your desires can control you.


"All man's efforts are for his mouth,
yet his appetite is never satisfied." 

Ecclesiastes 6:7


According to this book, the first step out: Become aware of every emotion you have as you experience it. Don't try to stop the emotion but learn to distance yourself from it, pain, sorrow or joy. Keep a part of yourself that is always observing yourself and your emotions.

By these definitions awakening is a process of building and maintaining the discipline of awareness.


Laziness brings on deep sleep,
And the shiftless man goes hungry.

Proverbs 19:15



"The wise man has eyes in his head,
while the fool walks in the darkness."

Ecclesiastes 6:7


Psychological Problems of "True believers"...

Eric Hoffer "was an American social writer and philosopher. He produced ten books and was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in February 1983 by President of the United States Ronald Reagan. His first book, The True Believer, published in 1951, was widely recognized as a classic, receiving critical acclaim from both scholars and laymen."

This is from the preface of his book, The True Believer;

"All mass movements generate in their adherents a readiness to die and a proclivity for united action; all of them, irrespective of the doctrine they preach and the program they project, breed fanaticism, enthusiasm, fervent hope, hatred and intolerance; all of them are capable of releasing a powerful flow of activity in certain departments of life; all of them demand blind faith and single hearted allegiance."

To start a fundamentalist religious group (or a non-religious one) blind obedience without question is necessary. If people are educated with history and the sciences in a way where it becomes integrated with their perception then lying to them becomes very difficult. If someone with religious authority lies to them, it will hurt to have someone they like lying to them but they will do what is right...eventually, once they are sure.

"The ideal devil is a foreigner. Hitler—the foremost authority on devils—found it easy to brand the German Jews as foreigners." (pp. 92-93)

Given the history of America and Britain in the region painting the west as 'the devil' is an easy thing to do. What was astonishing that the educated west did the exact same thing! Fundamentalists there use evidence out of context to turn all Muslims into the equivalent of 'devils'! [These Christian fundamentalists are an important constituent of the Republican Party]

In the same way the Muslim world was painted as 'the devil' during the crusades (started by the Pope for territorial reasons). Hatred becomes a habit. (p. 146) It takes roughly 21-30 days for the brain to build the neural processes to form a habit (depending on the intensity of the installation). If you hate someone and attack them (for example, through slander) then that behavior becomes a habit. A fundamentalist group, claiming to be from ANY religion, has developed a habit for hate and thus has lost all reason.(or at least will ignore reason unless the evidence is simply overwhelming and can’t be avoided)

The following extract is from the book "The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements" and is meant to illustrate why people become some emotionally involved in a mass movement or political party, without any ability - or even care for - rationality and reason;

8. Faith in a holy cause is to a considerable extent a substitute for the lost faith in ourselves. 

9. The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for his own self, the more ready is he to claim all excellence for his nation, his religion, his race or his holy cause. 

10. A man is likely to mind his own business when it is worth minding. When it is not, he takes his mind off his own meaningless affairs by minding other people's business. 

This minding of other people's business expresses itself in gossip, snooping and meddling, and also in feverish interest in communal, national and racial affairs. In running away from ourselves we either fall on our neighbor's shoulder or fly at his throat. 

11. The burning conviction that we have a holy duty toward others is often a way of attaching our drowning selves to a passing raft. What looks like giving a hand is often a holding on for dear life. Take away our holy duties and you leave our lives puny and meaningless. There is no doubt that in exchanging a self-centered for a selfless life we gain enormously in self-esteem. The vanity of the selfless, everi those who practice utmost humility, is boundless. 

12. One of the most potent attractions of a mass movement is its offering of a substitute for individual hope. This attraction is particularly effective in a society imbued with the idea of progress. For in the conception of progress, "tomorrow" looms large, and the frustration resulting from having nothing to look forward to is the more poignant. Hermann Rauschning says of pre-Hitlerian Germany that "The feeling of having come to the end of all things was one of the worst troubles we endured after that lost war."-' In a modern society people can live without hope only when kept dazed and out of breath by incessant hustling. The despair brought by unemployment comes not only from the threat of destitution, but from the sudden view of a vast nothingness ahead. The unemployed are more likely to follow the peddlers of hope than the handers-out of relief. 

Mass movements are usually accused of doping their followers with hope of the future while cheating them of the enjoyment of the present. Yet to the frustrated the present is irremediably spoiled. Comforts and pleasures cannot make it whole. No real content or comfort can ever arise in their minds but from hope.

13. When our individual interests and prospects do not seem worth living for, we are in desperate need of something apart from us to live for. All forms of dedication, devotion, loyalty and self-surrender are in essence a desperate clinging to something which might give worth and meaning to our futile, spoiled lives. Hence the embracing of a substitute will necessarily be passionate and extreme. We can have qualified confidence in ourselves, but the faith we have in our nation, religion, race or holy cause has to be extravagant and uncompromising. A substitute embraced in moderation cannot supplant and efface the self we want to forget. We cannot be sure that we have something worth living for unless we are ready to die for it. This readiness to die is evidence to ourselves and others that what we had to take as a substitute for an irrevocably missed or spoiled first choice is indeed the best there ever was.

It would help to develop empathy to fulfill the Golden Rule.
In the following lecture Karen Armstrong explains her view on the compassionate life and provides some guidance that can also be found in her book "Twelve Steps to a Compassionate Life"
‎"Allot of religious people prefer to be right, rather than compassionate." Karen Armstrong
The Heart Of Culture & Society
  • The Charter for Compassion
  • Heart of Culture and Society 1
  • Heart of Culture and Society 2
Picture
"Make peace with the universe.Take joy in it. It will turn to gold.Resurrection will be now. Every moment, a new beauty." Rumi

“Happiness is not something ready made. It comes from your own actions.” ― Dalai Lama

Edelman sums up the practical advice that emerges in seven words: "When fishing for happiness, catch and release".
0 Comments

Thus Begins My Chautauqua...

11/15/2012

0 Comments

 
"The really important thing is not to live, but to live well" - Socrates (from The Crito - 48 b)
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is a book of philosophy written by a guy named Robert Pirsig. He cuts through many ideas to ultimately explain his theory on 'Quality' as the main idea that pulls together a split in modern culture that he describes as the division between the 'romantic' and 'objective/rational' ways of perceiving the world. The philosophy is a purely intellectual exercise couched in an emotional journey which is very personal and moving. I don't agree with all of the ideas he writes about in his book but it provides much needed perspectives as well as needed brain exercise to help get the mental motors running.

The idea he explains particularly clearly is the one of Arete which is the idea that inspired the concept of this site. { The most articulated value in Greek culture is areté. Translated as "virtue," the word actually means something closer to "being the best you can be," or "reaching your highest human potential."}

There are many other useful ideas and perspectives but I just wanted to outline one which is explained on this webpage and the following is an extract about Chautauquas:

The Lyceum Movement was a somewhat similar idea that preceded the Chautauquas. It was founded in 1826 in Massachusetts by Josiah Holbrook as a pioneer attempt at community education (it "was not limited to students in the academy, but was open to all the townsfolk, young and old" [Harding 1966, p.29]), its topics of lectures and debates ranging from morality to science. This idea spread and soon a circuit was established, originally an exchanging of lecturers between neighbouring lyceums. The Lyceum Movement gained popularity and it was inextricably linked to the Transcendentalists; R.W. Emerson (one of the first professional lecturers) gave around 100 lectures at Concord Lyceum and H.D. Thoreau read his ´Civil Disobedience´ publicly for the first time at the same place in 1848.

"Lecturing in the lyceum was as close as they came to converting a truly transcendental mode of utterance into popular success. This indeed seemed to be a form in which unfrocked ministers could display their talents to best advantage. Lecturing involved many of the same oratorical techniques as preaching. It was a rapidly expanding field; and above all, it was open-ended. Anything was possible in the lecture room. ´You may laugh, weep, reason, sing, sneer, or pray, according to your genius,´ Emerson told Carlyle" (Buell, p.52.).
Picture
"Naturally, every age thinks that all ages before it were prejudiced, and today we think this more than ever and are just as wrong as all previous ages that thought so. How often have we not seen the truth condemned! It is sad but unfortunately true that man learns nothing from history." - Carl Jung


"Today the principle of habeas corpus, established when King John signed the Magna Carta in 1215, is under attack. There’s every reason to believe that a renewed effort with the use of the internet that we can instead advance the cause of liberty by spreading an uncensored message that will serve to rein in government authority and challenge the obsession with war and welfare.

What I’m talking about is a system of government guided by the moral principles of peace and tolerance.

The Founders were convinced that a free society could not exist without a moral people. Just writing rules won’t work if the people choose to ignore them. Today the rule of law written in the Constitution has little meaning for most Americans, especially those who work in Washington DC.

Benjamin Franklin claimed “only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.” John Adams concurred: “Our Constitution was made for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

A moral people must reject all violence in an effort to mold people’s beliefs or habits.

A society that boos or ridicules the Golden Rule is not a moral society. All great religions endorse the Golden Rule. The same moral standards that individuals are required to follow should apply to all government officials. They cannot be exempt.

The ultimate solution is not in the hands of the government.

The solution falls on each and every individual, with guidance from family, friends and community.

The #1 responsibility for each of us is to change ourselves with hope that others will follow. This is of greater importance than working on changing the government; that is secondary to promoting a virtuous society. If we can achieve this, then the government will change."
- From Ron Paul's Farewell Address To Congress 

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

"Let the record show that on January 16, 2012, the good people of South Carolina booed the Golden Rule." ― Jon Stewart... [Note: Golden Rule = ‘Love your neighbour as yourself'. Matthew 22:39]

0 Comments

    RSS Feed

    Websites:
    Culture & Society blog

    Instant Self-Hypnosis


    © Abe
    (Syed Abbas Eugene Abedi)

    Archives

    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Categories

    All
    1st Amendment
    2014/2016 Elections
    Adam Kokesh
    Archaeology
    Athiesm
    Atlantis Found
    Barack Obama
    Bernie Sanders
    Bill O Reilly
    Book Of Flint
    British Royals
    Carl Jung
    Cartoons
    Christianity
    Christmas
    Clarity
    Cognitive Dissonance
    Congress
    Culture & Society
    Debt Ceiling
    Dick Cheney
    Dolphins
    Equinox
    Fareed Zakaria
    Fox News
    Free Speech
    Heritage Institute
    History
    Intelligence
    Karl Rove
    Mars
    Mary Poppins
    Meditation
    Meridians
    Michelle Bachmann
    Music
    Nasa
    National Security
    Native Americans
    Neanderthals
    Nsa
    Obamacare
    Pancho Villa
    Philosophy
    Plato
    Politics
    Psychiatry
    Psychology
    Ron Paul
    Rupert Murdoch
    Solstice
    Terrorism
    Terrorists
    The Lone Ranger
    The Matrix
    Uk
    Usa
    Us Media
    Wall Street
    Whales
    White People
    Win Wenger
    Wormhole
    Zen

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.