The GOP Is A Bully...
The Democrats Are Cowards...
The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Indecision Political Humor,Video Archive
|
The GOP Is A Bully...The Democrats Are Cowards... On Topic - Political Parties - The Democratic Party: Stephen knows that when someone misbehaves, it's natural to assume that person is a Democrat. The Colbert Report
0 Comments
Background: The Voting Rights Act & Gay Marriage - The Colbert Report What Was Being An Employee In D South Like In D 'good Ol days'? GOP VS Ron Paul: A Return To The Suppressed Republican Primaries Case Study: Zimmerman Trial - Category: Racism Wisconsin's Recall Election & Americans for Prosperity's Absentee Ballot Typos: The Koch brothers-funded Americans for Prosperity PAC sends absentee ballot applications with minor inaccuracies to Wisconsin's Democratic districts: The Colbert Report Notes On The Coming Civil Rights Rehash In The 21st Century as the Republican Party begins it's campaign of Voter Fraud with the wrongful suspension of the Voting Rights Act: WHAT DOES THE SUPREME COURT’S VOTING RIGHTS ACT DECISION MEAN FOR DEMOCRACY? The Voting Rights Act was signed into law on Aug. 6, 1965, a year after the murder of three voting rights activists in Philadelphia, Mississippi, and just months after the brutal attack on peaceful protesters in Selma, Alabama. At the signing, President Lyndon Johnson called the act “a triumph for freedom as huge as any victory that has ever been won on any battlefield.” The new legislation was meant to enforce the 15th Amendment, which almost a century before, provided that “The right of U.S. citizens to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” The Voting Rights Act has two main provisions — first, a general prohibition on voting discrimination laid out in Section 2, then a requirement, laid out in Section 5, that states with a history of discrimination receive “preclearance” from the Justice Department before making any changes to voting qualifications, practices or procedures. The Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder struck down Section 4(b), which set out the formula for determining which states are subject to the Section 5 preclearance requirement, thus rendering Section 5 — which many consider the heart of the act — meaningless. America is Not a Post-Racial Society The Court went outrageously wrong in assuming we have become a post-racial America that no longer needs to be bound by the legal protections that have preserved the electoral process for nearly a half-century. Indeed, discrimination still happens, and it’s not limited just to the southern states covered under provisions of the Voting Rights Act. Discrimination happens across America: North, East, West and South. And, unfortunately, it is not rare. The Supreme Court’s decision utterly ignores the efforts to suppress voting in 2012. With no real evidence of voter fraud, more than 30 states considered laws to make voting more difficult for African Americans, low-income communities, the elderly and people with disabilities. Fifteen states implemented such measures. The efforts did not rely on poll taxes, dogs or fire hoses, but the intent was the same. Given this trend, the last thing the Court should be doing is sending a message of leniency. Instead, they should make it clear that efforts to suppress the vote will not be tolerated. Angela Glover Blackwell is founder and CEO of PolicyLink, the national research and action institute advancing economic and social equity. She is co-author of Uncommon Common Ground: Race and America’s Future, and contributed to Ending Poverty in America: How to Restore the American Dream and The Covenant with Black America. Blackwell serves on numerous boards, including The President’s Advisory Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Prepare for a Thrashing of the Democratic Process While great progress has certainly been made since the Voting Rights Act was put into place in 1965, new barriers to exercising the franchise are being erected at a rapid pace. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act provided assurance that in areas with a history of discrimination, those barriers would receive federal oversight to insure that they would not deter progress for voters of color. With the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County vs. Holder, jurisdictions once required to preclear any voting qualification or prerequisite will now be left to themselves to determine what laws they should adopt, a “right” the Court’s decision says is foundational for treating states equally. The Court ignores, however, the importance of insuring that laws are in place to treat citizens equally. In a nation with changing demographics, where a significant percentage of voters of color reside in now-formerly protected jurisdictions, the removal of federal oversight could lead to a sound thrashing of the democratic process. With protections removed, we will witness a widening gap between voters of color and white voters in voter registration, a decline in the number of minority elected officials and more restrictive laws that impact the elderly, the poor and other historically disadvantaged groups. It has taken a herculean effort of massive education and legal challenges from advocacy groups, nonprofit organizations and the federal government to combat the onslaught of restrictive legislation proposed in the last two years. It will take even more vigilance to protect the progress of the last fifty years and to exceed the promise of current conditions. Gilda Daniels is a voting rights expert, who has served as a Deputy Chief in the United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Voting Section in both the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. Professor Daniels is currently an assistant professor of law teaching critical legal theory, election law, and civil procedure at the University of Baltimore School of Law. Open Season for Voter ID Laws There can be no doubt that the Shelby County decision will slow progress toward racial equality and undermine democracy in this country. It will now be open season for states to pass laws ostensibly aimed at preventing voter fraud but actually aimed at suppressing participation by minorities who disagree with the governing majority about key issues of public policy. Even with Section 5 in place, we saw a huge wave of these laws pass last year. As the lawyer who argued and lost the Indiana voter ID case in the Supreme Court, I know from personal experience how difficult it will be to use more conventional legal remedies like standard civil lawsuits to tackle these insidious laws. The genius of Section 5 was that it provided for expedited review by the Department of Justice before new election laws could go into effect in states with a long history of attempting to suppress minority voting. States were required to show that the law did not impermissibly harm the voting rights of minorities. This outcome is particularly indefensible since the Fifteenth Amendment specifically authorized Congress (not the courts) to use its own judgment about the best way in which to grant full voting rights to African-Americans in the South. While the country has made great progress on voting rights since 1965, Congress in 2006 compiled an extensive record showing that in covered states there remained a need for the extraordinary remedy of Section 5 in order to prevent backsliding. Under the Fifteenth Amendment, it had the right to make that judgment, which it did virtually unanimously. The Court should have deferred to Congress on this important question. Paul M. Smith is Chair of the Appellate & Supreme Court Practice at Jenner & Block LLP. His extensive Supreme Court practice has included numerous cases involving voting rights, as well the First Amendment, gay rights and other issues. Pennsylvania’s Strict Voter ID Law Upheld A Pennsylvania judge upheld the state’s strict new voter ID laws on Wednesday. The decision was a blow to voting rights advocates who expected aslam dunk victory after the state admitted it was not aware of a single incident of in-person voter fraud and the state’s House majority leader made it clear that the law was politically motivated. In a 70-page order, Judge Robert E. Simpson, a Republican, said opponents failed to show “that disenfranchisement was immediate or inevitable.” Simpson did not rule on the full merits of the case, only on whether or not to grant a temporary injunction. Civil rights advocates say the law, which could affect as many as 750,000 registered voters who don’t have the required ID, will disproportionately keep poor, elderly, minority and student voters away from the polls. Opponents plan to appeal the case to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which is currently divided equally with three Democrats and three Republicans (the seventh member, Justice Joan Orie Melvin, a Republican, is currently suspended due to unrelated corruptions charges). A tie would uphold the law. Voter Fraud In Texas GOP Primaries: Texas Vote Count Doesn't Add Up Updated with Action Plan: Fraud confirmed in Texas. Election judge says votes were switched. RELATED FEATURES
In ten states so far — some of them swing states — voter ID laws make it prohibitively difficult for some voters, particularly the elderly, poor and minorities, to get required photo identification. Besides requiring voter ID, other laws have decreased the number of early voting days, made it harder for nonprofit groups to register new voters, and repealed election day voter registration.
Rather than throw your hands up in desperation at the powerful political steamroller smashing our democracy, Bill encourages you to re-double your efforts to make a difference, as others have. He offers some real-life, real-people examples, and asks you to share your encounters with politically-motivated rules that make it harder to register or vote, as well as stories of your efforts to overcome them. Leave your reporting in the comments below or at “The Fight to Vote” our special area spotlighting voter suppression across the country. And please share his request with friends and family. Bill Moyers Essay: Thomas Jefferson’s BetrayalJune 29, 2012 In this video essay, Bill reflects on the origins and lessons of Independence Day. We should remember, he says, that behind this Fourth of July holiday are human beings, like Thomas Jefferson, who were as flawed and conflicted as they were inspired, who espoused great humanistic ideals while behaving with reprehensible racial discrimination. That conflict — between what we know and how we live — is still a struggle in contemporary politics and society. In other words, it was kinda like this... Although, strangely enough, what goes around comes around... cause the South is returning to it's Southern Blue Blood slave ownership days (but with extra low wages instead of body ownership - a sort of freelance slavery so that everyone is living like a slave, i.e. just barely... except the standard of living is so high, in comparison to slavery days that. instead of little cages the employees work in cardboard houses that get blown over when the wind picks up or whatever(Texas) and nothing happens (you could say as workers to be used discarded... now middle class and poor white people have the same status as blacks though about 50% of America doesn't realize that what they want leads to their own doom). Anyways, meet the future of the South given it's current course (or it's most recent past & most likely future... if you want to be accurate): BREAKING discovery about The Texan Way of Doing Business: Is America Turning into Texas? What's happened Texas graphically illustrates the choice facing America. On April 17 there was a horrific explosion at the West Chemical and Fertilizer plant in West, Texas, that killed 15 people, injured more than 200, destroyed or damaged 150 homes and caused at least $100 million in losses. Five days later, Texas Governor Rick Perry was in Illinois trying to lure business to Texas, praising his state's limited regulations. Is Texas America's future? Republican conservatives have a simple economic precept: what's good for business is good for America. Conservatives believe states should provide a "business friendly" environment with low taxes and few regulations. They argue this inevitably creates jobs and builds community through the "trickle-down" theory of Reaganomics: "a rising tide lifts all boats." Texas is the foremost practitioner of the conservative theory. This year Chief Executive Magazine voted Texas "the best state to do business in" for the ninth consecutive year, citing factors such as low taxes and sparse regulations. Texas' 6.5 percent unemployment rate is below the national average. But the Texas economy has negative aspects that contributed to the explosion at the West Chemical and Fertilizer plant. There is no state fire code and McLennan, the county that housed the plant, also has no fire code. According to the New York Times Texas has also had the nation's highest number of workplace fatalities -- more than 400 annually -- for much of the past decade. Fires and explosions at Texas' more than 1,300 chemical and industrial plants have cost as much in property damage as those in all the other states combined for the five years ending in May 2012. In much of Texas zoning laws are non-existent. In 1962, when the West Chemical and Fertilizer plant originally opened, the facility was far from downtown; in recent years, a school, nursing home, and apartment complex were built nearby. A consequence of Texas' "anything goes" attitude is not only the nation's highest number of workplace fatalities but also America's dirtiest environment. According to the Houston Chronicle Texas leads the U.S. in greenhouse gas emissions. Texas' coal-fired power plants and oil refineries generated 294 million tons of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases in 2010, more than the next two states -- Pennsylvania and Florida -- combined. Regrettably, many Texans lack adequate health care. The Texas Observer reports that the state ranks first in the nation for adults without health insurance. Over the last decade, Texas added thousands of jobs in construction and energy. Unfortunately, Texas leads the nation in construction fatalities. The Texas construction industry is characterized by dangerous working conditions, low wages, and legal violations that hurt working families and undercut honest businesses. Furthermore, an average of 39 energy industry workers die each year. Oil and gas field services and drilling workers were killed on the job in Texas more than those in any other profession, according to a Houston Chronicle analysis of five years of fatal accidents investigated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. And when Texans are injured on the job, they often have great difficulty getting their medical claims reimbursed. Texas is the only state where employers have a choice about paying worker's compensation. If the worker's employer doesn't provide coverage, the worker has to file a civil claim. But even when there is worker's compensation, the system is notoriously difficult. Texas Governor Rick Perry roams the U.S. luring workers to Texas with the promise of good jobs, but the reality is unimpressive. Writing in the American IndependentPatrick Brendel observed the new Texas jobs are primarily low-wage jobs: Texas has by far the largest number of employees working at or below the federal minimum wage ($7.25 per hour in 2010) compared to any state, according to a [Bureau of Labor Statistics] report. In 2010, about 550,000 Texans were working at or below minimum wage, or about 9.5 percent of all workers paid by the hour in the state. On June 14, Governor Perry vetoed an equal pay bill. Meanwhile, the ruined city of West, Texas, is struggling to recover. Total losses will be more than $100 million and FEMA likely will reimburse only 10 percent. The City of West has sued the owner and supplier of the West Chemical and Fertilizer Plant. On April 22 Texas Governor Rick Perry was asked about the explosion at the West Chemical and Fertilizer Plant and contended that "more government intervention and increased spending on safety inspections would not have prevented" the West catastrophe. What's happened in West and Texas graphically illustrates the choice facing America. We can adopt an extreme pro-business strategy and subordinate worker pay and safety; we can, in effect, tell the 99 percent, "You're on your own." Or we can adopt a strategy that puts people first; we can decide that capitalism has to be subordinate to democracy and protect the rights of all Americans. Bob Burnett is a writer and activist in Berkeley, Calif. Huffington Post: The Texas Fertilizer Plant Explosion Wasn't an Accident Almost everyone in America knows the names of the two young terrorists allegedly responsible for the April 15 Boston Marathon bombings, but few can identify the owner of the fertilizer plant that exploded in West, Texas, two days later. Both are culpable of killing innocent people, but the media, along with government regulators and law enforcement agencies, poured much more time and resources into finding the two Tsarnaev brothers than they did in investigating Donald Adair. Crime in the streets (particularly by terrorists) is big news but crime in the suites rarely makes headlines. Why isn't the American public calling for the arrest, conviction, and imprisonment of Adair, the owner of the West Fertilizer Company in West, Texas, where an explosion on April 17 killed 14 people, left 200 others with injuries (including burns, lacerations, and broken bones), flattened houses and a 50-unit apartment building, destroyed a nursing home, damaged a local school, and left a crater 93 feet by 10 feet? The explosion was so devastating that investigators, almost two months after the incident, are unable to definitively determine the exact cause of the explosion. But it is possible that Adair -- who also owns Adair Grain (the parent company of West Fertilizer) and Adair Farms, including about 5,000 acres of cropland and grassland in the area, worth several million dollars -- consistently flouted the law and common sense safety measures that put both his employees and the surrounding community at risk. When 84-year-old Eula Bingham, OSHA chief under President Jimmy Carter, heard the news about the West, Texas, explosion, she thought, "Oh my god a fertilizer plant." According to Bingham, "fertilizer plants are well known as the most horrible, explosive places in the world." Adair had ample opportunity to know and follow the law and certainly knew the consequences of failure. After 9/11 companies like Adair's were required to inform the government of chemicals that could be used in terrorist attacks. West Fertilizer stored large quantities of anhydrous ammonia and ammonium nitrate, in the middle of a small town. The company failed to tell the Department of Homeland Security that it was storing 270 tons of ammonium nitrate (the same chemical that Tim McVeigh used to bomb the Oklahoma city federal building in 1995, which left 168 people dead) as required by law. The Colbert Report Explanation: That spending is good for an economy shouldn't be debatable. If you have a business and nobody buys your stuff (i.e. if no spending occurs) you will make no money. This is basic economics,even George Bush wanted people to spend to boost the economy, he just wanted it to be ALL on consumer spending while the Government focuses it's spending on war in Afghanistan and Iraq. The debate should be instead on WHAT FORM OF SPENDING SHOULD BE CARRIED OUT. I support peaceful spending activities (done properly, transparently and efficiently), while the GOP and the Paul Ryan Plan goes the other way.
In other words: When trying to convince people not to do a Stimulus... this was the argument put forward by the Republican National Committee and Fox News i.e. spending leads to a depression... but SPENDING ON WAR (NOT ON PEACEFUL ACTIVITIES) leads to recovery ! Can anyone say Schizophrenia? The Colbert Report Notes: 30 secs: A ton of money is spent. 2:20: Super Pacs exist because the Supreme Court says Money = Speech Stephen Colbert Introduces Frank Luntz: For help with crafting a message around this I went to America's foremost expert in helping people realize how they already feel... Meet Frank Luntz. This is the man that reframed the estate tax as the death tax & healthcare reform as Government takeover of healthcare{See Image below}... Image Meaning: USA has a market based healthcare approach (good) made by crony capitalists (bad)... blocked by conservatives to win elections (worse)... willing to destroy the American economy to use the Southern Strategy to win elections (the worst) Blog Post Related To Conservative Semantics: Summary of "Socialism", Keynesian Economics & "Road to Serfdom" (by F.A.Hayek) - Stephen Colbert's Introduction To Frank Luntz Continued: Now some critics have called Luntz a spin doctor who manipulates emotion but Luntz would reframe that Fox News Analyst Notice how much simpler Frank Luntz explains it (that's how you know someone understands their material, i.e. ease of explaining/communicating it): The Colbert Report How to handle an audience and appeal to their feelings:
1. Body language tips, 2. Handling audience tips, 3. Creating a more positive phrase for 'drilling for oil' became 'energy exploration'. (inaccuracy doesn't matter as long as there is a sliver of fact - KISS principle, i.e'. keep it simple stupid), 4. 'climate change' as opposed to 'global warming' (sounds less severe than it actually is) 5. 'simple truth' (i.e. the reframe here is: 'not a lie as it contains a sliver of fact'!), 6. 'you decide' to lock in the last manipulative phrase (most of the viewers decisions are based on the views of who they trust... even the books they read ), 7. 'buzz words' - words that people focus on opposed to facts, 8. Use 'simple truth' only once in a discussion or article ?, 9. If a politician is caught lying he/she should apologize 3 times, "I'm sorry, I made a mistake, forgive me" (to lie your way out) 10. Uses the sighing gesture in an interesting way... separating interview reality from fox news manipulations realities... Going Deeper: Your Subconscious Mind What Is Hypnosis? What Is Self-Hypnosis? Hypnosis & NLP Money, Love & Emotions CNN: Could Zimmerman have been aware of the much publicized and debated 'stand your ground' law when he made his decision to stalk Treyvon? (i.e. could he have known about the Stand your Ground law given he had a gun, was a neighborhood watchman, and had made several non-emergency calls before?) 1:30 - Expert & FBI admit gun wasn't processed properly. “Who is on the top and who is on the bottom does not really matter as much as people try to make it out to be,” attorney Lauren Lake says... What makes someone an aggressor?(prosecution is throwing the case)... The Colbert Report Article: Why has Fox News under-reported sexual assault in the military? They're too busy with fake scandals to acknowledge the real ones. Blog posts related to the above image:
Benghazi Attacks Talking Points : Greg Gutfeld calls the mainstream media "Obama's scandal condom," and ABC News obtains 12 drafts of the Benghazi talking points. (05:28) The Colbert Report 1:30 : The acts of terror verses vicious terrorism or, whatever word for terror you use , is using different words for the same thing getting across the SAME MEANING... i.e. these were terror attacks. That's not under dispute.
2:10: The only one who has been talking about this is me Fox News but from everyone else radio silence i.e. a non-issue is being made into an issue by repeating it again and again for dufflepuds. 2:30: The Scandal Condom that the Fox News anchor is referring to is basically BULL as all of the US TV Media is connected to the GOP in some way or these sorts of cover-ups or these wouldn't be possible. The image above refers to a uniquely Fox News cover-up, they, being the War party, they like to keep the military looking extra-good cause they will be using em badly if they can ever get them back. 2:45: This is Semantics and is also about the words people use {He just said the same thing using DIFFERENT words. Get it? If not, figure it out.} RELATED: Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’ i.e. using a standard sympathy strategy on his viewers of a grieving mother. I wouldn't say this if it wasn't for the continuous Benghazi coverage over 4 deaths in context of 1000's of soldiers killed in the unjust lie based Iraq war. Background: Quick Analysis of Zimmerman's Re-enactment Pre-Analysis 1 of The Zimmerman Trial Pre-Analysis 2 Of The Zimmerman Trial Pre-Analysis 3 Of The Zimmerman Trial Unanswered Questions: Note that in his FIRST statement Zimmerman STARTED with his excuse for killing. He hadn't thought out his story in that much detail thus all the discrepancies. Considering that it took months to get an investigation started, he was right. (i.e. Florida has a Stand Alone Law which allows people such as Cheney to shoot people in the face and walk away without an investigation... law came later) Now watch this video: Intro: Zimmerman told police that after disappearing behind the houses, Martin came back toward the street, circled Zimmerman’s truck, and then once again headed back toward the houses. Zimmerman said that’s when he thought to get out of his truck and look for a street sign, because he was still on the phone with non-emergency dispatch and wanted to give the dispatcher more information: 1:30 - He answers a question with a pause then without pause. When he says YES it's done forcefully. Video is short. Report is shorter, says "The examinee has told substantially the complete truth" - NOTE: I have covered lie detectors here. That laptop gadget looks kinda outdated to me. I think we should be using more sophisticated lie detectors for cases such as these to lower the chances of a false positive or a false negative. Of course, the video and lie detector results should be available publicly if this is a public trial, which it is. Let the public decide on the lie detector results when they become fully available. 3:30 - Severity of his injuries had cleared up. Look at this screen shot I took of the beginning of the above video it's comeplety consistent with self-inflicted injuries on the sidewalk I hypothesized here, shown below, i.e. he hit his head on the corner a few times till he got blood: Hypothesis: Maybe he was scared for his life. This could be gang related. Zimmerman does look like he could be that sort of a guy and he definitely doesn't have a voice thick enough to reach that octave. That voice screaming was definitely a black kids voice (given the natural context of this first case - the situation may change after I post this). Zimmerman probably told him before he was going to kill him why he was doing it or something like that, some sort of gang rule or initiation ritual. Then lay him out in a cross. {Occam's razor says that the simplest theory is the most likely one}
On 911 Call: The admissibility of one of the most critical pieces of potential evidence in the George Zimmerman murder trial remains unresolved. An extended court session Monday evening failed to settle the issue of whether prosecutors will be able to play 911 calls from the night Trayvon Martin was killed. The so-called Frye hearing will resume Wednesday at 4 p.m. ET. Note: The reason why the lawyers don't want this call admissible is because it pretty much shows an intent to kill. Afterall, it proves he followed Treyvon Martin for a whole minute after being told not to. That's damning evidence. It's that simple. Background: Quick Analysis of Zimmerman's Re-enactment Pre-Analysis 1 of The Zimmerman Trial Pre-Analysis 2 Of The Zimmerman Trial Zimmerman told police that after he drove past Martin, he stopped at the neighborhood clubhouse to call the Sanford Police Department’s non-emergency line to report what he called Martin’s suspicious activity. Zimmerman said after he pulled over and made the call, Martin walked past him and was looking at his truck and “still looking around at houses.” During his call to police, Zimmerman said, “Something’s wrong with him. Yup, he’s coming to check me out. He’s got something in his hands. I don’t know what his deal is.”: 1. Dramatization looks like it's out of a horror flick. Suspense movie at the very least. I know some white women in the South probably feel that way(I'm half white, I've seen it yes, I'm a tat-a-tale)... but Zimmerman? Males don't stalk single solitary males walking around the neighborhood under street lights and around ones car. That would be stalking. 2. In the dramatization the kid is walking with his hands in his pocket (possibly because walking in a skipping motion with skittles and an ice tea is too cheerful of an image). 3. 1:02: Notice that using proper street lighting it's no longer very dark. 4. At hand in his waistband Trayvon is shown with hands in his pockets. Then with hands by his side. NEVER as it actually was with his skittles and ice tea. 5. 1:42: 'These assholes always get away' Zimmerman. i.e. Now Treyvon is not a single individual but multiple guys. Possible Goal: Prepare the scene for a murder so he could either 1. Look good to his neighborhood for killing a hoodlum (Mistake: forgot there are blacks in his neighborhood) OR 2. He wanted to kill for fun and this call gives him the cover of being a "good guy". 6. 2:20 : Still after all the varied movement he's still acting like he thinks this kid is a burglar! (Wow What a crazy story this guy Zimmerman is sketching for us!) 7. Begins to follow Treyvon says "Fuckin Punks". Building the anger and the case on the phone of being the "good guy". 8. 2:28: 'Are you following him? Ok. We don't need you to do that'... Zimmerman says OK and keeps on following him (i.e. possible goal: that's not a part of his plan) 9: 2:40: STILL following him. Count out the seconds. How long is 12 seconds? 10. 3:00: STILL following him after swearing. 11. Probable: He stalked him. Saw him in the distance (it's unlikely Treyvon was stalking him and hit him when he's so obviously talking on the phone and reporting him... HE LIVES RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET... could Zimmerman be jealous over Treyvon's girlfriend? He does have a wife and I've heard that life goes downhill after marriage)... then Zimmerman carried out his intended plan. To bag himself a black kid scalp? What was he counting on? Answer: The Southern Strategy. |
The "GOP Exposed" Blog
MusicArchives
December 2013
Categories
All
|